Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Elizabeth Smart thread, August 24-31, 2002

Posted on 08/23/2002 9:35:01 PM PDT by IamHD

I don't know when Utahn children start school, but Elizabeth should/would be starting the 9th grade, soon. :(


TOPICS: Chit/Chat
KEYWORDS: elizabethsmart
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 701-720721-740741-760 ... 881-900 next last
Comment #721 Removed by Moderator

Comment #722 Removed by Moderator

Comment #723 Removed by Moderator

To: spore-gasm
Instead of Henry Lee, Ed Smart should have brought in Mark Furhman. He helped solved the 20 year old Martha Moxley case that no one else would touch.

Furhman evidently has very good investigative skills and that is what is needed to find out what happened to Elizabeth. I would love to see him "hound-dog" this case.
724 posted on 08/30/2002 6:50:47 AM PDT by FR_addict
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 723 | View Replies]

To: spore-gasm
"if Ricci dies that it's a dead issue "

duh

725 posted on 08/30/2002 9:38:06 AM PDT by cherry
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 723 | View Replies]

To: sandude
"I am appaled at your posting of somebodys private mail even it you received it in error."

I just don't see it that way. jengaio is engaged in malicious mischief. She is just more subtle than JG. When someone freepmails you and there is no clear request or expectation of confidentiality, I think that you are entitled under most circumstances to post it for all to see, especially when it contains the type of personal attacks which jengaio has been making "in private."

I doubt that the message was really "misdirected." Although it is not my practice to attack people behind their backs or even in private, and I am sure that it is not your practice either, would I be protected in having my attacks exposed if I just pretended that the vicious attack was really meant to be behind your back as opposed to your face in private? I don't think so.
726 posted on 08/30/2002 9:44:43 AM PDT by Iwo Jima
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 550 | View Replies]

To: jengaio
I am offended by your use of the word "cracker" as an insult. In someone else, I would assume that they were merely ignorant. But I do not see how you, the linguist, could not know the honorable derivation of that term. You owe me and all of my honest, hard-working Georgia ancestors an explanation and an apology.
727 posted on 08/30/2002 9:55:03 AM PDT by Iwo Jima
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 491 | View Replies]

Comment #728 Removed by Moderator

To: Iwo Jima
I had to look it up as I didn't know what the word was in reference to...so here is what I found on the word "CRACKER"

Cracker: (a) Small, crisp biscuit-like food item, typically a snack item; (b) One who cracks, as in "safe cracker".

Cracker: Derogatory reference to whites, typically conservative southerners who are still fighting the Civil War; term may or may not connote a belief in segregation or slavery. Used mostly by blacks and by liberal, white northerners.

729 posted on 08/30/2002 10:03:54 AM PDT by Neenah
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 727 | View Replies]

To: All; Iwo Jima
CRACKER ref. page
730 posted on 08/30/2002 10:06:34 AM PDT by Neenah
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 729 | View Replies]

To: Neenah
crack·er (krãk'ər)

n.

A thin crisp wafer or biscuit, usually made of unsweetened dough.

One that cracks, especially:

A firecracker.

A small cardboard cylinder covered with decorative paper that holds candy or a party favor and pops when a paper strip is pulled at one or both ends and torn.

The apparatus used in the cracking of petroleum.

One who makes unauthorized use of a computer, especially to tamper with data or programs.

Offensive.

Used as a disparaging term for a poor white person of the rural, especially southeast United States.

Used as a disparaging term for a white person.

731 posted on 08/30/2002 10:13:34 AM PDT by Neenah
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 730 | View Replies]

Comment #732 Removed by Moderator

Comment #733 Removed by Moderator

To: jengaio
Many times, you called people a "cracker", I didn't know what it was. (I am very young, you understand..LOL), ...and then Iwo Jima ref. it...so I was curious, and looked it up on my great computer...and found what you meant. Their word, their definition in both the common usage and the slang usage (which I believe you used, be it n. or adj.)...and posted the results.

Simple as that. End of topic..we have the answer.

734 posted on 08/30/2002 10:33:29 AM PDT by Neenah
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 733 | View Replies]

To: Yellowcat
The room was dark and the houseguest thought it was a family member trying to find something and trying not to wake the guest. The guest said to the person that it was ok to turn on the light, but the person just coughed and with a muffled grunt left the room. Later when they realized things had been stolen, the houseguest told about the mystery person looking in the dresser in the darkened bedroom.

Thanks, Yellowcat. Ricci took $300 and jewelry so I thought he might have seen the jewelry while working there and known it was in a spare bedroom and went after it but couldn't resist getting in the guests wallet when the opportunity arose while he was there.

735 posted on 08/30/2002 10:38:05 AM PDT by Sherlock
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 718 | View Replies]

Comment #736 Removed by Moderator

Comment #737 Removed by Moderator

To: spore-gasm
I thought this guy had a Honda, or something similar - at least that's been the story till now. Who said he walked down the street? Ed?

Interesting. I thought I read he put the stuff in the other guys car across the street and they drove off but interestingly the type of car was never identified. If that is correct it would be interesting why LE would not want to release a description of the car. Probably was a Honda.

738 posted on 08/30/2002 10:45:27 AM PDT by Sherlock
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 720 | View Replies]

To: jengaio
And you call yourself a linguist. Your credibility is destroyed.
739 posted on 08/30/2002 10:49:12 AM PDT by Iwo Jima
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 737 | View Replies]

Comment #740 Removed by Moderator


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 701-720721-740741-760 ... 881-900 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson