Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

To: the Deejay
"The receipt for the green jacket says 01/27, but Someone has mixed all the items together in a pile, so LE's on scene think it all belongs with the 02/04 stuff."

Actually what I should have said is this:

(Ott has to hurry so he puts DNA on green jacket,not realizing it isn't on the 02/04 receipt. That DW had been there a week before and not picked up the green jacket yet. That he had gone in 02/04 and left the black clothes without picking up the jacket. WHODA THUNK IT? )

Later, LE's with warrant take all items, receipts back for testing. When it turns out that the green jacket has positive hits for Danielle's DNA the LE's have proof. Then, they check the receipts and find the green jacket isn't on the 02/04 receipt. OH WELL. Hope for a stupid jury, or try to hide that info. Seems someone put the 'plant' on the wrong piece of clothing.

450 posted on 08/15/2002 2:09:51 PM PDT by UCANSEE2
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 440 | View Replies ]


To: UCANSEE2
I could easily buy your planting theory if LE had a
blood sample of Danielle's blood, but they didn't.

As for the receipts, the jury should have them in
the jury room. Surely, one of them would catch the
descrepancy in the clothing to the receipts. And
would easily be able to see the green jacket was at
the cleaners on 1/27.
459 posted on 08/15/2002 2:16:41 PM PDT by the Deejay
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 450 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson