[the Deejay]

I could easily buy your planting theory if LE had a
blood sample of Danielle's blood, but they didn't.

As for the receipts, the jury should have them in
the jury room. Surely, one of them would catch the
descrepancy in the clothing to the receipts. And
would easily be able to see the green jacket was at
the cleaners on 1/27.

[hoosiermama]

.....if LE had a
blood sample of Danielle's blood, but they didn't.


Wasn't their blood in Danielle's room? (From nose bleeds)

[small_l_libertarian]

Oh, but they did. They had Danielle's blood from her room (on the sleeve of a shirt or pj shirt). Dip it in distilled water and squeeze as necessary.

[UCANSEE2]

I could easily buy your planting theory if LE had a blood sample of Danielle's blood, but they didn't.

OK. I hear you. How do you know they didn't have a sample ?

They found Danielle's underwear with a stain in the crotch. That was 02/02,I believe. They took a sample. It is what was used later to compare to the lapel of the green jacket, and LO and BEHOLD, it came back A PERFECT MATCH. Not good, average, BUT PERFECT.

They had a supposed blood stain on the PJ's that were lying there also.

You know, the one's that Danielle hadn't worn. THey were just lying there inside out, with a bloodstain on the ankle area. (when Feldman tried to ask about Danielle having a scrape on her ankle, DUSEK objected and MUDD sustained it. WHY?) The LE's say that the DNA test of that stain didn't have Danielle's DNA. (well whose was it?)

REASON: we aren't supposed to know that those are the PJ's she wore. That she didn't have them on when she disappeared. If they admitted it was Danielle's blood, it would have damaged their case and made Damon/Brenda out to be bigger liars.

[UCANSEE2]

As for the receipts, the jury should have them in the jury room. Surely, one of them would catch the descrepancy in the clothing to the receipts. And would easily be able to see the green jacket was at the cleaners on 1/27.

It was there. THe jury did hear about it. THE LE witness said the COMPUTER MADE A MISTAKE when it printed the date on the receipt. END OF STORY.

[John Jamieson]

The police didn't have her blood and didn't need it, because they never proved the stains were human blood, much less Danielle's. All they needed was DNA which they had from her underware.

[Jaded]

They had blood from her clothing and who know what else.