[The Other Harry]

So what's the prevailing opinion here? The longer the jury's out, the better or worse for DW?

I don't know the rules of thumb on this, but I think it at least shows that the jury is being careful and methodical. In my mind, that's a good thing. I think it probably helps DW.

I say that for a reason. The prosecution's case is very narrow. The forensic evidence in the MH, period, end of story.

The case could be decided very quickly if that was all the jurors are looking at. If they are looking at more than that, I think that helps Dee-Dub.

[Greg Weston]

>>>the jury requested ``all available evidence of pornographic images'' and a photograph of a teen-age daughter of the defendant's ex-girlfriend.<<<

That may indicate they have decided on the other things and are hashing out the child porno charges.

[John Jamieson]

I think better for not guilty; it means that they've skipped making an emotional decesion which could only be guilty and are studiing the evidence instead.