Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Jurors To Hear Recorded Westerfield Tapes: Mudd Still Wrestling With Media! (VERDICT WATCH-Aug.14th)
Union Trib ^ | August 14, 2002 | San Diego Staff

Posted on 08/13/2002 10:12:33 PM PDT by FresnoDA

Jurors ask to hear recorded Westerfield interview

Judge Mudd lashes out at talk radio 'idiots,'
bars KFMB radio producer from courtroom

SIGNONSANDIEGO STAFF
and WIRE SERVICES

August 13, 2002A San Diego jury spent a brief second day deliberating August 9, 2002 in the trial of David Westerfield, man accused of kidnapping and murdering 7-year-old Danielle van Dam, before breaking for the weekend without reaching a verdict in the closely watched case. Judge William D. Mudd goes over the jury verdict form with jurors before sending them into deliberations in the trial at the San Diego courthouse on August 8.  (Dan Trevan/San Diego Herald Tribune via Reuters)

The fourth day of deliberations in the David Westerfield trial has ended with no conclusion by the jury. The jury will resume deliberations Wednesday morning at the San Diego County Courthouse. Earleir today, jurors asked to hear Westerfield's only recorded explanation of what he was doing the weekend 7-year-old Danielle van Dam was kidnapped.

Superior Court Judge William Mudd said he was granting a request from the jury for a tape recording and transcript of the taped interview Westerfield gave to police interrogation specialist Paul Redden on Feb. 4, two days after Danielle's disappearance.

During the interview, Westerfield makes a reference to "we" as he describes his meandering trip through San Diego and Imperial counties on Feb. 2 and Feb. 3.

"The little place we, we were at was just a little small turnoff-type place," Westerfield said.

Westerfield, 50, could face the death penalty if convicted of murder, kidnapping and a special circumstance allegation that the killing of Danielle van Dam occurred during the commission of kidnapping.

He is also accused of the misdemeanor possession of child pornography.

Jurors are in their fourth day of deliberations.

Mudd's disclosure came during a 10 a.m. open hearing on a request from KFMB-AM 760 to let River Stillwood, an assistant radio producer for talk show host Rick Roberts, back into the courtroom to cover the trial.

"She's out and will remain out and will not be permitted in for any live proceedings... because she is the representative of an individual who takes great glee and delight shoving it in this court's face," Mudd said.

Mudd ejected Stillwood from the courtroom on Thursday after asking her to tell him who told Roberts about the details of a Wednesday exchange between Mudd and the attorneys in the case during a sealed hearing.

Stillwood told Mudd that she didn't know who gave Roberts the information. On the air, Roberts later said he had received a call from a source in the courthouse.

The court is conducting an internal investigation, but cannot compel Roberts and Stillwood to name their source, Mudd said.

Stillwood can still sit in the pressroom and watch the video feed of any court activity, Mudd said.

KFMB was welcome to send someone else to sit in the courtroom, so long as the person was representing the radio station and not Roberts, he said.

KFMB's attorney Joann Rezzo argued that the disclosure did not violate the defendant's right to a fair trial. She also argued that Stillwood didn't give him "the source of the leak" because she didn't know who it was.

Before Mudd made his ruling, he invited comments from prosecutor Jeff Dusek, who managed only a wry remark.

"My inclination is to comment, but on advice of counsel, I I will submit," Dusek said, gesturing to his fellow prosecutor, Woody Clarke.

Defense attorney Robert Boyce told Mudd he was concerned about the integrity of proceedings. "They broadcast it, they knew what they were doing," Boyce said.

He called it "just another effort to sensationalize these proceedings."

Mudd told the media attorneys he welcomed the opportunity to make a "full and complete record" of his decision to eject Stillwood.

In his comments, Mudd made it clear he was still angry with KFMB television's decision to include a high school yearbook photo of Neal Westerfield during a telecast of the son of the defendant's testimony. Mudd had ordered that no television or print images of the adult, who is now 19, be transmitted.

The judge's inclination was to ban both the station's radio and TV representatives from the trial.

"Frankly, they seem to be the two networks in this community that just don't seem to get it," he said.

However, after his wife advised him to "sleep in it, " he gave the matter "serious thought," Mudd said.

He quoted a line from a Supreme Court decision in 1976 involving a press restraint issue in Nebraska.

" The extraordinary protections afforded by the First Amendment carry with them something in the nature of a fiduciary duty to exercise the protected rights responsibly--a duty widely acknowledged but not always observed by editors and publishers," Mudd said. "It is not asking too much to suggest that those who exercise First Amendment rights in newspapers or broadcasting enterprises direct some effort to protect the rights of an accused to a fair trial by unbiased jurors. "

Mudd said he was troubled by the host's decision to broadcast the information, knowing it was from a closed hearing.

The judge wasn't impressed by the host's justification that the general public was already aware of the issue, and that Stillwood was ignorant of the source.

He said the host wasn't conducting a search for the truth, but a grab for ratings. He also took the opportunity to lash out at "idiots from LA talk stations," who broadcast an afternoon program from a media compound outside the County courthouse. He said the members of the talk station were "acting like teen-agers" in front of the courthouse.

The judge acknowledged he could not control such behavior but could control his own courtroom.

The judge said officials from KFMB must be taking "great glee in shoving it in this court's face."

Fred D'Ambrosi, news director for KFMB-TV and Radio, said his television station showed only a high school yearbook photo of Westerfield's son.

"We didn't shoot him in court, which was the judge's order," D'Ambrosi said.

Regarding River Stillwood, D'Ambrosi said the issue was important because of the First Amendment and a free press. He added that he was not in charge of the Rick Roberts program.

"We're just trying to report the news and uphold the First Amendment," D'Ambrosi said. "If (Mudd) can ban River Stillwood, he can ban anybody." The news director suggested that the judge was angry because he didn't like the story that was reported.

D'Ambrosi said he had never spoken to Mudd, and called his reading of the situation "totally inaccurate."

Mudd said he had done a 180-degree turnaround on the issue of allowing cameras and reporters in the courtroom since deciding to allow Court TV to cover the trial live.


TOPICS: Society
KEYWORDS: westerfield
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 801-820821-840841-860 ... 981-991 next last
To: small_l_libertarian
Can't catch me. Can't catch me.

Neener Neener

Awwww. I'm getting goofy. Gotta get outta here. See you guys later.
821 posted on 08/14/2002 7:20:58 PM PDT by JudyB1938
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 815 | View Replies]

To: small_l_libertarian
Yes. Stay on topic. That's why I'm here. If we stray too far, I'm gone.
822 posted on 08/14/2002 7:21:22 PM PDT by KnutCase
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 815 | View Replies]

To: The Other Harry
Wouldn't you like to know...

:-)
823 posted on 08/14/2002 7:22:07 PM PDT by small_l_libertarian
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 820 | View Replies]

To: The Other Harry
Be nice...:~)

sw

824 posted on 08/14/2002 7:22:54 PM PDT by spectre
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 812 | View Replies]

To: carenot
Oh, my goodness. You shouldn't call him out.

"Nono nonono, don't say the G-word !"

825 posted on 08/14/2002 7:23:37 PM PDT by dread78645
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 625 | View Replies]

To: Rheo
We now know that they have made money on the side for years in real estate

"Can you explain further please?"

I know Brenda has a lot of real estate.

826 posted on 08/14/2002 7:23:57 PM PDT by The Other Harry
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 819 | View Replies]

To: demsux
Anyone imprisoned by Doosuk using Faulkner as an expert
should be filing appeals.

Doosuk, in this trial, didn't believe Faulkner's expertise.
827 posted on 08/14/2002 7:24:21 PM PDT by the Deejay
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 818 | View Replies]

To: VRWC_minion
So the fact that the movie was so offensive that two adults burst into tears from watching it is completely lost on you folks because the they were alternate jurors ?

What the heck did they see that would make them cry? Was it a real murder of a little girl? If not, why did they cry?

828 posted on 08/14/2002 7:24:49 PM PDT by carenot
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 268 | View Replies]

To: Rheo
FWIW, the entomology actually interested me to a certain degree...It seems that using an Entomologist is SOP when a body has become decomposed.

As I see it, the prosecution is saying that the head should have a maggot mass and that's why the timelines don't fit.

Haskell was ADAMANT that the flies will go to ANY opening, INCLUDING natural orifices...

I'm thinking that maybe something was placed over her face/head which would delay the fly arival in that area.

Particularly, maybe someone close to the deceased could not bear to see her face laying there on the ground, so throw a towel or something over the face...a coyote or even the wind could have moved in later.

829 posted on 08/14/2002 7:27:21 PM PDT by demsux
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 819 | View Replies]

To: carenot
Two alternate jurors were the ones crying. Anyone have profiles of the alternates?
830 posted on 08/14/2002 7:27:23 PM PDT by KnutCase
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 828 | View Replies]

To: carenot
What the heck did they see that would make them cry? Was it a real murder of a little girl? If not, why did they cry?

I cry at any movie that has a dog in it. Ever see "Under Where the Red Fern Grows?"

831 posted on 08/14/2002 7:28:11 PM PDT by The Other Harry
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 828 | View Replies]

To: KnutCase
Link to all the jurors.

http://courttv.com/trials/westerfield/jurors.html
832 posted on 08/14/2002 7:29:24 PM PDT by the Deejay
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 830 | View Replies]

To: alisasny
Call me niave

Rather call you Alisa or Lisa.

Feldman would defend a man he knew was guilty, I have no doubts about that. It must personally pain him to have his whole law career in this case in public with many watching and he may fail.

A lawyer is required to defend his client to the best of his ability, whether he knows the client is guilty or not.

in the meantime..what are you all going to do about Dusek and the DA's who we know are just as corrupt as the defense attorneys.

This is what people on FR are organizing groups for. This is what was done by people on FR during the last election. We made a difference. Each person can pass on the knowledge of corruption. Each person can fight it where they live. Each person can get involved in groups that fight corruption, support politicians that have a record of fighting corruption.

Feldman is not a man of integrity

I don't know what makes you say this, nor do I agree. He sounded like he believes in his heart DW is not guilty and fought for him like he believed it.

The entire legal system today is screwed.

Well, you won't get too many arguments on that point.

833 posted on 08/14/2002 7:29:31 PM PDT by UCANSEE2
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 768 | View Replies]

To: SilentWitness
Our souls are always watching what our physical being does throughout our lives.

and... Sometimes our spirit(soul) laughs, sometimes it cries.

834 posted on 08/14/2002 7:30:53 PM PDT by UCANSEE2
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 769 | View Replies]

To: The Other Harry
Have you seen "A Dog of Flanders"? Great movie...will even make an adult male from Specials Ops cry.
835 posted on 08/14/2002 7:30:56 PM PDT by KnutCase
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 831 | View Replies]

To: juzcuz
I think I'm the one out of touch

Considering who that term came from, and what it might mean, I would prefer to be 'out of touch'.

836 posted on 08/14/2002 7:33:05 PM PDT by UCANSEE2
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 776 | View Replies]

To: KnutCase
I haven't seen that.

There was also the one about the three animals that crossed the counrty trying to make their home.

837 posted on 08/14/2002 7:33:42 PM PDT by The Other Harry
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 835 | View Replies]

To: UCANSEE2
Feldman's actions certainly indicated in closing arguments that he believed in the innocence of his client.
838 posted on 08/14/2002 7:34:08 PM PDT by KnutCase
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 833 | View Replies]

To: UCANSEE2
THey are with the blue blanket used to wrap Danielle, the missing comforter with blood all over it, the black boots with blood all over them, and my briefcase with a million dollars in it. If you see it, I want it back.

It's wrapped up in a plastic mattress cover that you can get at any Wall-Mart for $12.99.
If you find a second hard-drive in the briefcase, that belongs to Kimmy. Night vision goggles or Febreze are Jaded's. Any frozen fly maggots can go to VRWC_minion.

839 posted on 08/14/2002 7:34:23 PM PDT by dread78645
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 647 | View Replies]

To: JudyB1938
JudyB,

Couldn't agree more. On CTV they discuss the DA's & 'wins'..I rarely hear about seeking justice or the truth..its all about winning..to hell w/ truth it seems.
For all we know some very high up people could have been 'swingers'...I have wondered if LE used 'diverson
tactics'??? Get the attention OFF of certain circumstances, the drugs, the swingers,...& focus them elsewhere..voila... David Westerfield.
840 posted on 08/14/2002 7:36:48 PM PDT by domestice
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 669 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 801-820821-840841-860 ... 981-991 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson