[small_l_libertarian]

Oddly enough, the defense doesn't seem the slightest bit worried about the "child porn." Feldman challenged the jury to look at all of it. Maybe it's not really child porn, huh?

[Freedom2specul8]

You could be right. Doesn't it seem like they were a little desparate to insinuate that it was neals. Does that offer us a clue as to how worried they are about it? I didn't get the impression they were denying it, just downplaying it and trying to confuse the jury with computer talk. What the jury actually saw is what drived the issue...the defense can't argue through what they saw and felt, and through the jurors tears. I suppose if none of that had happened, the child porn wouldn't have been a factor..

[KnutCase]

Small l.....I think Feldman emphasized that and challenged the jury to look close because police witness did not say it was child porn, only that it "bordrered on child porn". So if jury determines it's not child porn it may be a plus for DW... They had been told that looking at child porn leads to rape and murder of children. That's why he was yelling at them to take a close look at everything on the videos. I doubt they will.