Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

To: the-gooroo
Is it just me or does this drive anybody else crazy?

Agree. Given that he had an internet connection, I think if he were genuinely a pedophile there would have a ton of evidence of that on his computer.

The way I understand things, of the tousands of images that had been archived on the CD's, there were only about 80 that appeared to depict under-age girls. Of those, there were something like 16 that depicted pre-pubescent females, and some of those were animations. No other evidence on the computer or in his past to indicate pedophelia.

I don't buy it.

556 posted on 08/11/2002 9:21:05 PM PDT by The Other Harry
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 555 | View Replies ]


To: The Other Harry
I've been thinking about you analysis of the jury. Did you actually compare it to the profiling you did for the people on this thread?
557 posted on 08/11/2002 9:29:13 PM PDT by hoosiermama
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 556 | View Replies ]

To: The Other Harry
The computer experts, Lawson and Watkins said there was NO pre-pubescent porn. There were some pics that they could not determine if the girls were under 18 or not.
558 posted on 08/11/2002 9:48:14 PM PDT by Jaded
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 556 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson