Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

To: dread78645
My prediction for the outcome, by this jury:

Not Guilty, 10 percent
Guilty, 30 percent
Hung Jury, 60 percent

Anyone care to make their own predictions? I'm not asking you what you think the outcome SHOULD be, but what it WILL be. (At this stage, the evidence, rumors and speculations have been hashed and re-hashed ad infinitum).

24 posted on 08/10/2002 2:22:54 AM PDT by truth_seeker
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: truth_seeker
My best guess is a hung jury. From what I can see,there's enough reasonable doubt to vote for an acquittal,but that's my perspective,and I'm not on the jury. I think that a potentially very important factor that's not been brought up very much in these threads is that the San Diego Police Department(or elements of the SDPD)seems to have a less than great reputation,and that will very likely affect,or color some perceptions of some of the jurors. I know that the subject has been brought up here on FR,but what I'm in no position to do is to make any sort of prediction on how that will or won't affect the jurors' debating.
26 posted on 08/10/2002 7:19:42 AM PDT by sawsalimb
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 24 | View Replies ]

To: truth_seeker
I'm afraid I agree with you. I see a hung jury or possibly a guilty verdict - I just have a feeling.
27 posted on 08/10/2002 9:16:09 AM PDT by mommya
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 24 | View Replies ]

To: truth_seeker
Probably a hung jury. There might be some who saw the bloodstains or the porn and decided guilty. People of that mindset are not easily swayed. There may be some like me who saw reasonable doubt and now see not guilty. The evidence has been presented (well, as much as Mudd would allow) and nothing convinced me of his guilt. If the evidence and testimony didn't convince me, I don't think another juror's opinion would.

Personally, I think it would be very difficult to change the mind of a person who has already seen reasonable doubt.

45 posted on 08/10/2002 10:17:02 AM PDT by Krodg
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 24 | View Replies ]

To: truth_seeker
I'll have to agree with you, but swap the guilty/not guilty.

Not guilty 30%
Guilty 10%
Hung jury 60%

77 posted on 08/10/2002 11:59:24 AM PDT by dread78645
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 24 | View Replies ]

To: truth_seeker
I say 'not guilty.'

The jury already displayed it's independence and good sense by deciding to meet on Fridays. That was a direct snub to Judge Mudd, Feldman's biggest nemesis.

There are a couple of engineers on the jury, IIRC, and they will sympathize with DW, as so many of us hane, once we saw the evidence.

I would bet that a few rational minds would be able to convince the rest that Dusek did indeed need to prove the kidnapping, and there is no path from DW to poor, dead, Danielle.

Let's hope they pic up on the drycleaners miss that folks caught on to here only yesterday.
161 posted on 08/10/2002 6:13:13 PM PDT by pinz-n-needlez
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 24 | View Replies ]

To: truth_seeker
i WILL TAKE A GUESS ON THE JURY,2 HUNG 10 GUILTY
311 posted on 08/10/2002 10:12:30 PM PDT by fatima
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 24 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson