Probably a hung jury. There might be some who saw the bloodstains or the porn and decided guilty. People of that mindset are not easily swayed. There may be some like me who saw reasonable doubt and now see not guilty. The evidence has been presented (well, as much as Mudd would allow) and nothing convinced me of his guilt. If the evidence and testimony didn't convince me, I don't think another juror's opinion would.
Personally, I think it would be very difficult to change the mind of a person who has already seen reasonable doubt.