[MizSterious]

Look, just because Kim and others post any kind of bogus information that supports their opinions on here, it doesn't mean any of the rest of us have to buy it. If you don't like it, tough. If you have an opinion, it's fine to say so. Just don't try to pass it off as a fact.

[gigi]

I know you had to go make dinner so you missed Dusek, but don't worry, he didn't finish so you'll get to see him tomorrow :)

[CyberAnt]

Hmmmm? So, what I hear you saying is you think it is "my opinion" that Danielle went out of the house by herself? Is that correct?

How did you come to that conclusion??

I said, BRENDA SAID Danielle would run off and they would have to search for her. I didn't make that up - I saw the interview on TV when she said it. If Brenda was lying, I have no way to prove otherwise. Brenda's statement is not a figment of my imagination. I heard her, and I saw her make the statement.

My whole contention was this: If Brenda's statement was true - then perhaps Danielle had walked out of the house by herself - thus there were no clues to be found in the house regarding Westerfield or anyone else being in the house who were not supposed to be there.

[Southflanknorthpawsis]

I'm just jumping in here from nowhere and this may have been discussed. Forgive me if it's repetitive, but.......

I have never seen a prosecutor attempt to intimidate jurors like I saw today. Dusek essentially told them that if any one of them didn't agree with the majority, he or she had better rethink his or her position.

Not only did I find that incredibly unacceptable, but I wondered how many jurors might be like I am. The moment someone told me, in so many words, that I better change my mind to match the opinion of others, would be the day I would dig in for good. Whatever way I was leaning would become locked in the second I interpreted Dusek telling me that it shouldn't. What nerve !!!!!