[VRWC_minion]

I thought they were supposed to consider one at a time?

Just said that was a violation of the law and used a cheater of a card game to prove it. The card player wins ever game which is impossible without cheating but individually it is reasonable to win each game.

[VRWC_minion]

Dismantling Feldman's definition of reasonable doubt.

[mommya]

I thought it was like - the jurors had to go along and take each point which apparantly indicates guilt - consider that point and whether or not there is another reasonable interpretation - if there is - they are to sort of discard it - not use it in the total picture so to speak? That is not correct?