Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

To: cyncooper
That is confusing. The other day the judge made another statement about that

2.13. WE'VE HAD PRIOR CONSISTENT AND INCONSISTENT TESTIMONY BY BOTH HIMS AND HERS, SO 2.13 WILL BE GIVEN IN ITS ENTIRETY.

345 posted on 08/02/2002 9:40:15 PM PDT by Krodg
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 344 | View Replies ]


To: Krodg
That would be referring to the "admitted untruthfullness" you think? I agree, confusing, but evidently the lawyers know who they're talking about.

I wonder if the judge gives the instructions, then during closing the lawyers point out the "who" and the "what" as it refers to untruthfulness.

346 posted on 08/02/2002 9:48:54 PM PDT by cyncooper
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 345 | View Replies ]

To: Krodg
WE'VE HAD PRIOR CONSISTENT AND INCONSISTENT TESTIMONY BY BOTH HIMS AND HERS

Do you think that is directed at Damon and Brenda ? The whole case might go into the trash-bin.

349 posted on 08/02/2002 10:19:58 PM PDT by dread78645
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 345 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson