[cyncooper]

That would be referring to the "admitted untruthfullness" you think? I agree, confusing, but evidently the lawyers know who they're talking about.

I wonder if the judge gives the instructions, then during closing the lawyers point out the "who" and the "what" as it refers to untruthfulness.

[John Jamieson]

The single biggest point Desek made against Dr. Hall:

Q. HOW LONG HAVE YOU BEEN A LAWYER?
A. FIVE YEARS.
Q. AND YOU'VE TESTIFIED SINCE YOU'VE BECOME A LAWYER?
A. YES, I HAVE.

[John Jamieson]

I been searching the Hall testimony for the supposed Dusek gotchya, but I can't find it. What are these TV experts talking about that Dusek got Hall to agree with him about 2/2-2/3?

[Krodg]

I think the lawyers will try to point out the untruths but I'm not sure what will be allowed in. I'm not sure the lawyers have quite the free reign in closing that many people think they do.