[JudyB1938]

When I first discovered CTV, I really liked Nancy. Little did I know. I soon learned better. However, there are a lot of people out there who are just like I was - they don't know how deceptive and biased she is. The first clue though should have been she is a FORMER PROSECUTOR (I think). And I wonder how many people SHE railroaded! I know for sure she sure wants to do it now.

13th Juror indeed! If those jurors watched her, she just may get her wish! However, I am hanging on to the thread that they seem to be intelligent and analytical people.

[cyncooper]

The first clue though should have been she is a FORMER PROSECUTOR (I think).

She is. The first time I ever saw her was years ago when I had Court TV and lived in another state. Court TV was showing a trial of a man who killed his wife (he was convicted) and the prosecutor was Nancy Grace!

I believe she lived and practiced in Atlanta.

[cyncooper]

However, I am hanging on to the thread that they seem to be intelligent and analytical people.

#1: I don't believe for a minute that the jurors are violating the court's orders.

#2: You guys are watching and hearing different opinions and are able to form your own despite that.

#3: One can be intelligent and analytical and believe DW committed the crime based on the evidence presented.

[spectre]

Judy, Judy, Judy :)

Think way back to the Clinton years and how Nancy Grace "defended" him.. It was downhill from there for Nannie. She's just another version of Susan Estrich.

sw