Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

To: JudyB1938
However, I am hanging on to the thread that they seem to be intelligent and analytical people.

#1: I don't believe for a minute that the jurors are violating the court's orders.

#2: You guys are watching and hearing different opinions and are able to form your own despite that.

#3: One can be intelligent and analytical and believe DW committed the crime based on the evidence presented.

174 posted on 08/02/2002 3:12:41 PM PDT by cyncooper
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 172 | View Replies ]


To: cyncooper
Your #3 ... True.

You'll notice I didn't add "and acquit" to my statement in regards to their reasoning ability. Although I do hope the jury and I agree as to what is proper "reasoning". :0)
176 posted on 08/02/2002 3:21:36 PM PDT by JudyB1938
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 174 | View Replies ]

To: cyncooper
#3: One can be intelligent and analytical and believe DW committed the crime based on the evidence presented.

I don't think anyone has said otherwise.

The majority of the "DW is not guilty" club don't believe the prosecution has presented the evidence or a theory of the crime that Westerfield commited this beyond a reasonable doubt.

You think the prosecution has.

269 posted on 08/02/2002 6:39:58 PM PDT by dread78645
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 174 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson