Frustrated Prosecutor Dusek Swats At Final Bug Expert: Westerfield's Soon Will BUG The Jury....

Court TV ^ | August 2, 2002 | Harriet Ryan

[the Deejay]

Well, folks, I tried to hear/see what was going on in the court room today via Court TV & muting the hosts. However, I saw/heard very little of the court room & tried to get a handle on which side was getting their court instructions to the jury entered.

All I was able to figure out (and not surprisingly) is the judge knocked back just about every instruction the defense wanted in.

If any of you caught more of the decisions/discussions, could you please post a brief rundown? I would appreciate it very much. Thanks.

[connectthedots]

Make him take a dance class with you, or entice him to do so. I'm sure you can figure out what will motivate him. I would suggest a Nightclub Two-step class since it is a very easy dance to learn the basics and once he realizes how sensuous dancing is, he may get hooked.

[JudyB1938]

Well, it is said that a person has to be really careful. Get rid of one demon, and a legion will replace it.

[spectre]

"He may get hooked"...By someone like ..Brenda? Denise? Barb?...LOL!!!

sw

[connectthedots]

Because it seems like there a several people with higher levels of education, I think those individuals will have lived life long enough to realize that you can't trust the media to get things right and some of them may have had experiences with the legal system to understand you can't really trust prosecutors and judges to be fair.

I think DW will be acquitted after a relatively short deliberation; a day or two at most, but maybe only a couple of hours.

[I. Ben Hurt]

That may be exactly what happened.

[alexandria]

It is indirect circumstantial evidence and it has been very reasonably explained.

Great post, right on target.
I think what further proves this circumstantial evidence point is that Dusak himself ADMITS that theirs is a case based mostly on circumstantial evidence of felony murder, when he was stating why there could not be a lesser charge.

[the Deejay]

"I think DW will be acquitted after a relatively short deliberation; a day or two at most, but maybe only a couple of hours."

I think so, too. I am thinking, it will take them less than a day to deliberate.

[the Deejay]

Samantha and Cassandra, which have nothing to do with this case, or any other case.

Personally, I don't think the judge should have even mentioned it (twice) to *this* jury.

[spectre]

Alright! I'll be praying you guys are right...thanks for the encouragement..:~)

sw

[juzcuz]

I'm writing you guys quick... Before my server goes out again... I've been having major problems all day. I'll get back later, after all the rain passes.

[JudyB1938]

When I first discovered CTV, I really liked Nancy. Little did I know. I soon learned better. However, there are a lot of people out there who are just like I was - they don't know how deceptive and biased she is. The first clue though should have been she is a FORMER PROSECUTOR (I think). And I wonder how many people SHE railroaded! I know for sure she sure wants to do it now.

13th Juror indeed! If those jurors watched her, she just may get her wish! However, I am hanging on to the thread that they seem to be intelligent and analytical people.

[cyncooper]

The first clue though should have been she is a FORMER PROSECUTOR (I think).

She is. The first time I ever saw her was years ago when I had Court TV and lived in another state. Court TV was showing a trial of a man who killed his wife (he was convicted) and the prosecutor was Nancy Grace!

I believe she lived and practiced in Atlanta.

[cyncooper]

However, I am hanging on to the thread that they seem to be intelligent and analytical people.

#1: I don't believe for a minute that the jurors are violating the court's orders.

#2: You guys are watching and hearing different opinions and are able to form your own despite that.

#3: One can be intelligent and analytical and believe DW committed the crime based on the evidence presented.

[Yeti]

DITTOs to your whole assesment.

IMO: There are government employees involved in this case who need to swing(in the literal sense) for what they have done, and CA law makes it possible if it can be proven.

The truth will out.

[JudyB1938]

Your #3 ... True.

You'll notice I didn't add "and acquit" to my statement in regards to their reasoning ability. Although I do hope the jury and I agree as to what is proper "reasoning". :0)

[pyx]

Nancy must be developing Alzheimer's, she forgot the bleach and steam-cleaning the MH.

Rumor has it that Nancy Grace has evidence that David Westerfield drove his entire motorhome into a giant vat of bleach to destroy evidence.

[spectre]

Judy, Judy, Judy :)

Think way back to the Clinton years and how Nancy Grace "defended" him.. It was downhill from there for Nannie. She's just another version of Susan Estrich.

sw

[the Deejay]

"Rumor has it that Nancy Grace has evidence that David Westerfield drove his entire motorhome into a giant vat of bleach to destroy evidence."

BAWHAHAHA!!!

[spectre]

And Nancy Grace knows ALOT about bleach...meow..:~)

sw