Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Prosecution's Bug Expert Struggles On Stand:08/01/2002 Westefield Trial Nears Finish Lap!
Court TV ^ | August 1, 2002 | Harriet Ryan

Posted on 07/31/2002 9:20:15 PM PDT by FresnoDA

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 121-140141-160161-180 ... 1,041-1,044 next last
To: demsux
If body is enclosed, the bugs wouldn't have an effect for 4 days? (dont' quote me, garbled, lost feed)
141 posted on 08/01/2002 9:39:00 AM PDT by Freedom2specul8
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 140 | View Replies]

To: PFKEY
What would you do about the child porn charges? (I understand that we have not been privy to the questionable images, but going on assumption that they really are child porn)

  Well, knowing what we know here (which is different from what the jury has heard), I would probably return not guilty, but nowhere near as easily as I would on the kidnap/murder charge.

  First off, I think the guy's been railroaded, and would be loathe to give the prosecution even the minor victory - which I grant is not supposed to figure into a juror's reasoning, but there you go... Secondly, some of the pictures shown were recovered deleted files, which argues, to me at least, that he'd downloaded them as part of a bundle, seen what they were, and got rid of them (that calculation would change immensely if they were deleted after 2 Feb.) Given that, I'd probably be inclined to suspect the others were downloaded similarly.

  The guy has a porn habit, which I find distasteful, but doesn't appear to be a kiddie porn collector. That, combined with my disgust at the prosecution, would likely lead me to return not guilty.

Drew Garrett

142 posted on 08/01/2002 9:39:03 AM PDT by agarrett
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 27 | View Replies]

To: ~Kim4VRWC's~
Wow KIM...

This BUG-GUY from the State of Missouri is really kicking Dusek's EGGSPURTS in the acorns.....

LOL

Is this better....sorry, I had my hearing aid turned down...../so


143 posted on 08/01/2002 9:39:40 AM PDT by FresnoDA
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 140 | View Replies]

To: FresnoDA
He sure is ringing Dusie's bells. It also helps that he speaks to/for the layman.
144 posted on 08/01/2002 9:41:08 AM PDT by Southflanknorthpawsis
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 137 | View Replies]

To: FresnoDA
ROFLOL
145 posted on 08/01/2002 9:41:21 AM PDT by hoosiermama
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 143 | View Replies]

To: demsux
Feldman...hypothetically, if a child was killed feb 1-4, stored in a storage compartment, dumped nude on dehesa... ????

witness: if body was dumped at night, blowflies would attack as soon as opportunity presented itself..

Would blowflies delay infestation for 5 or 7 days.... NO he wouldn't expect it.

146 posted on 08/01/2002 9:41:26 AM PDT by Freedom2specul8
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 140 | View Replies]

To: UCANSEE2
S/b salad bar.
147 posted on 08/01/2002 9:41:36 AM PDT by Jaded
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 112 | View Replies]

To: demsux
Flies are resiliant to drought...
148 posted on 08/01/2002 9:42:18 AM PDT by Freedom2specul8
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 140 | View Replies]

To: cyncooper
You must be right about the WAD OF HAIR around the CHOKER.<{P>That is what the testimony says.

I don't think much interpretation is needed by either one of us. You are right about it being a large wad or clump of hair.

149 posted on 08/01/2002 9:42:23 AM PDT by UCANSEE2
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 142 | View Replies]

Comment #150 Removed by Moderator

To: ~Kim4VRWC's~
With the kind of mummification that was described on Danielle's body would not have chanded this forensic entomologist time line at all.

The blow flies would have entered the mouth, nose, eyes, anus, vagina right away.

151 posted on 08/01/2002 9:43:19 AM PDT by Spunky
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 140 | View Replies]

To: Jaded
Exactly what I thought. Sidebar/salad bar/side salad, what do you want judge ?
152 posted on 08/01/2002 9:43:36 AM PDT by UCANSEE2
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 147 | View Replies]

To: demsux
if mummified: it wouldn't change his earlier conclusion..teh blowflies would access... to natural orfices when they have an opportunity.. (mouth, nostril, ears, eyes, genital and anus)
153 posted on 08/01/2002 9:44:14 AM PDT by Freedom2specul8
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 140 | View Replies]

To: basscleff
swirling reasonable doubt?

Yep. Now we have three and a half bugsters saying that the body couldn't have been there as early as the 5th.

Considering that LE frequently uses entomology experts to prove cases, they can't deny the science.

So where do they go from here? Looking for the real perp???????

154 posted on 08/01/2002 9:45:41 AM PDT by Southflanknorthpawsis
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 150 | View Replies]

To: demsux
ants: do ants gather blowfly larva?

Witness, have been indicated as predators

Any ant evidence in this case? There was an ant in the collection...there were some ants at the scene but not in extrodinary numbers.

Is it possible that ants could destroy blowfly population LOST Feed..NO, ants are predators...and if the ants are that effective, we would not have blowflies.

Opinion alert: duh

155 posted on 08/01/2002 9:47:08 AM PDT by Freedom2specul8
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 140 | View Replies]

To: spectre; FresnoDA
Defense will go last I think. I'm curious where FR posters get info I can't seem to find. I've read the preliminary hearing posts and witness testimony but miss many things such as Barbara not being present while the pizza was being eaten, a neighbor saying PDVD has a local girlfriend, things evidently not testified to. Is there another site to look up this info? I'm watching Court TV via little satellite dish and it keeps skipping out. It's perfectly clear and sunny here in Kansas today so can't figure out what's the problem. Anyone else having this trouble?

I've been lurking at FR for a long time, too bashful to post but finally decided to go for it. Hi to all.
156 posted on 08/01/2002 9:47:37 AM PDT by I. Ben Hurt
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 82 | View Replies]

To: UCANSEE2
He says Goffs calculations were all off. (My words)

But we all knew that. Didn't we.;-)

157 posted on 08/01/2002 9:48:47 AM PDT by Spunky
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 152 | View Replies]

To: demsux
disagreement within bugologist community wrt:maggot mass (LOST FEED)
158 posted on 08/01/2002 9:49:12 AM PDT by Freedom2specul8
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 140 | View Replies]

To: ~Kim4VRWC's~
The Michigan entomologist on Court TV agreed that the body was probably not there until after Westerfield was under police surveillance. He said that the prosecution should be looking at other possibilities to prove their case, such as an accomplice (which he said was unlikely), or more likely, a window in the police surveillance during which time DW could have moved the body.
159 posted on 08/01/2002 9:50:02 AM PDT by Eva
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 153 | View Replies]

To: Spunky
He says Goffs calculations were all off.

I bet Bob Hall double checked his arithmetic last nite . . .

160 posted on 08/01/2002 9:51:28 AM PDT by dread78645
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 157 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 121-140141-160161-180 ... 1,041-1,044 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson