To: ~Kim4VRWC's~
The Michigan entomologist on Court TV agreed that the body was probably not there until after Westerfield was under police surveillance. He said that the prosecution should be looking at other possibilities to prove their case, such as an accomplice (which he said was unlikely), or more likely, a window in the police surveillance during which time DW could have moved the body.
159 posted on
08/01/2002 9:50:02 AM PDT by
Eva
To: Eva
Did prosecution object to his claim that prosecution should look somewhere else?
To: Eva
a window in the police surveillance during which time DW could have moved the body.Sounds like the prosecution's best chance is to claim that San Diego LE are also incompetent in surveillance capabilities.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson