Replies

Also, I still find testimony that mainly talks about the orange fibers being in the SUV, and his house laundry (maybe some laundry from RV also?). I can't find any discussion about comparison or quantities of orange fibers found in the RV. This would fit with him driving from Dad's with attached orange fibers and then going up to bed (although 100's of 1" orange fibers sounds pretty high for just dancing contact). I would think there would be orange fibers (or similar quantities) in the RV if Danielle was wrapped in something orange.

I found some interesting comments in the transcript from Monday. It appears the prosecution will argue that DW destroyed evidence (this would mean someone likely committed the crime). The evidence mentioned is the dry cleaning of the jacket, the "missing" BLACK boots, Daniell's PJs and the items that contain orange and blue fibers! How can you claim someone destroyed something when you don't know what it is!

MR. DUSEK: 2.06 WOULD BE THE HIDING, DISPOSAL, GETTING RID OF, TRYING TO GET RID OF, THE BLOOD EVIDENCE ON THE JACKET, TAKING IT TO THE DRYCLEANER'S, TRYING TO CLEAN THAT UP. TAKING THE COMFORTER TO THE DRYCLEANER'S WHEN IT STILL HAD DOG HAIRS ON IT. THE MISSING COWBOY BOOTS THAT HE APPARENTLY WAS WEARING THAT NIGHT. THEY HAVE BEEN LOST, DESTROYED, CONCEALED. THE VICTIM'S PAJAMAS HAVE NEVER BEEN FOUND. THEY HAVE BEEN LOST, DESTROYED, CONCEALED. AND ALSO THE MATERIAL THAT CONTAINS THE BLUE AND ORANGE FIBERS, THEY HAVE NEVER BEEN FOUND OR LOCATED. I BELIEVE THEY'VE BEEN DESTROYED OR CONCEALED.

I can't find any testimony that dog hairs were found in the SUV. I don't know if that means there are none, or if they did not check. Seems strange that if the orange and blue fibers were from something used to carry Danielle that there would not also be the dog hairs in the SUV like those found with the other orange and blue fibers in the house.