[clearvision]

I found some interesting comments in the transcript from Monday. It appears the prosecution will argue that DW destroyed evidence (this would mean someone likely committed the crime). The evidence mentioned is the dry cleaning of the jacket, the "missing" BLACK boots, Daniell's PJs and the items that contain orange and blue fibers! How can you claim someone destroyed something when you don't know what it is!

MR. DUSEK: 2.06 WOULD BE THE HIDING, DISPOSAL, GETTING RID OF, TRYING TO GET RID OF, THE BLOOD EVIDENCE ON THE JACKET, TAKING IT TO THE DRYCLEANER'S, TRYING TO CLEAN THAT UP. TAKING THE COMFORTER TO THE DRYCLEANER'S WHEN IT STILL HAD DOG HAIRS ON IT. THE MISSING COWBOY BOOTS THAT HE APPARENTLY WAS WEARING THAT NIGHT. THEY HAVE BEEN LOST, DESTROYED, CONCEALED. THE VICTIM'S PAJAMAS HAVE NEVER BEEN FOUND. THEY HAVE BEEN LOST, DESTROYED, CONCEALED. AND ALSO THE MATERIAL THAT CONTAINS THE BLUE AND ORANGE FIBERS, THEY HAVE NEVER BEEN FOUND OR LOCATED. I BELIEVE THEY'VE BEEN DESTROYED OR CONCEALED.

[Jaded]

Per testimony there were no black boots. Dark brown or perhaps blackcherry which is a black-brown-burgundy depending on the light and what you're wearing it with.

[UCANSEE2]

. It appears the prosecution will argue that DW destroyed evidence

AND DON'T FORGET, the briefcase with A MILLION DOLLARS in it. It is mine, and I want the money back.!!!!!

[cyncooper]

How can you claim someone destroyed something when you don't know what it is!

They will argue that item(s) tying Danielle to DW left those fibers. What are those items? DW isn't saying. But the quantity of orange fibers in his home indicates that is where the item came from and he hasn't provided the item to the police---they did check an afghan which did not match.