Is that a way of over looking the fact DW was not scented in the vD house? We can't have that glaring fact presented as fact now, can we?
Was it presented as fact to the jury? I am honestly asking to be pointed in the direction of search dog testimony. Thanks!
(P.S. VRWC_minion's theory is DW was in the house and out right away, which is what I have always thought, too. The less time someone is present, the less time the leave a scent that would be detected later)