Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

To: BARLF
Is that a way of over looking the fact DW was not scented in the vD house? We can't have that glaring fact presented as fact now, can we?

Was it presented as fact to the jury? I am honestly asking to be pointed in the direction of search dog testimony. Thanks!

(P.S. VRWC_minion's theory is DW was in the house and out right away, which is what I have always thought, too. The less time someone is present, the less time the leave a scent that would be detected later)

744 posted on 07/30/2002 8:38:05 AM PDT by cyncooper
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 735 | View Replies ]


To: cyncooper
Presented to the jury? That the FBI dog did not hit on DW's scent in the vD house?

I haven't seen anywhere it was presented to the jury. What I am saying very clearly is: Had the scent dog hit(Dw's scent) then it would have been reported and believed by everyone. When there was no hit it was never mentioned again. At least as far as I can find.

Good Luck, maybe you can find reference to it being acknowledged there was no hit.

745 posted on 07/30/2002 8:48:54 AM PDT by BARLF
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 744 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson