For someone who's supposed to be so upset that his daughter is missing, I find him as a cold fish to his wife. Why isn't he comforting her? And, if you're right about the chair, his arm on the back of the chair appears to be that he is so relaxed and hasn't a care in the world.
BTW, what info did you receive from your cop friends at the SLCPD regarding this case since you try to portray that you know it all and everyone else is wrong?
I haven't recieved much of value. The detectives are keeping the critical information very close to the vest. Information I have recieved has been shared previously. In spite of what you and a few others on these threads would have us believe, there are KNOWN facts in the case. They have been revealed in the media at press conferences and interviews with key witnesses. Some of the statements by the police and others are often mis-quoted here and elsewhere and sadly they are believed and assumed to be correct, leading to totally different conclusions.
A prime example is the oft quoted "trusted member of the community". A little digging not only proved that the officer never said "trusted member of the communithy", but what he did say substantially broadened the entire context to include Ricci and others.
Another example comes from a statement I made the other day about Smart not hiring Ricci back after the theft. Brigette was confident that I was mistaken and produced several links that could be interpreted that way. I was just as adamant that I had heard or read a Smart statement saying he wasn't rehired. Fortunately, Sherlock found the quote.
No, I'm not always right, but I'm a very detail oriented person. You and and a few others seem to be more in the touchy-feely aspects rather than cold hard facts. All of your cheap shots at Ed Smart miss one very important fact. He passed his polygraph, so it doesn't make a damn bit of difference whether you or anyone else likes his body language.