Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

People weigh less on a hard surface
New Scientist ^ | Jume 30, 2002 | Ian Sample

Posted on 06/30/2002 6:26:56 PM PDT by gcruse

NewScientist.com

 
 

People weigh less on a hard surface

 
09:20 30 June 02

Ian Sample

 

It's not a dieter's myth after all. You really do weigh more if you put your scales on the carpet. And now we know why.

David MacKay, a physicist at the University of Cambridge, heard about the strange effect after a chance conversation with a fellow academic. "I was just chatting to her and she said, 'You're a physicist. Why do you weigh more on carpet than on a hard surface?' I didn't have a clue, but it seemed like a good question to throw at an undergrad," he says.

 
Why we weigh more when the scales are on a carpet

So MacKay and his student Jon Pendergast brought in some standard analogue bathroom scales and tried them out on different surfaces. Sure enough, they found they weighed in at around 10 per cent more on thick carpet than on the hard floor.

To find out why, Pendergast took several sets of scales apart and measured the movement of the internal mechanisms when loaded on different surfaces. Inside each set of scales, four levers or "fulcrums", each pointing inwards from one of the corners, transmit the weight of the person to a spring-loaded metal plate at the back of the scales. The movement of the plate is then transferred via a metal rod to turn the dial on the scales.

Pendergast found that on a hard surface, the base of the scales bows. This makes the fulcrums at each corner of the scales tilt in slightly, shortening the distance between each fulcrum and the point at which the load pushes onto the lever.


"Huge difference"

Put the scales on a deep carpet, however, and the scales sink into it, so the carpet supports the base, which prevents it from bending. This increases the distance between each fulcrum and the point at which its lever is loaded, so for the same force the lever moves further. Even a small increase in this distance can add several kilograms to the weight registered on the display.

The manufacturers calibrate the scales on a hard surface, not a carpet. And this makes sense, says MacKay, as more people have easy access to a solid floor than to a deep shag-pile carpet.

"I've always thought this was an urban myth," says a spokeswoman for Weight Watchers. "But it sounds like it makes a huge difference."

Pendergast found that digital scales were far less prone to the effect because of a slight difference in their internal mechanism. He finished his investigation by using a hacksaw to cut tiny notches in each lever for the fulcrums to lock into. This cut the weight change effect on carpet from over 10 per cent to just 2.5 per cent.

 
09:20 30 June 02
 

Return to news story

  © Copyright Reed Business Information Ltd.

 



TOPICS: Science
KEYWORDS:

1 posted on 06/30/2002 6:26:56 PM PDT by gcruse
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: gcruse
Moral of the story: forget dieting; instead, put your scale on a slab of marble.
2 posted on 06/30/2002 9:31:46 PM PDT by luvbach1
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: gcruse
People weigh less on a hard surface

That does it!!! The carpeting goes tomorrow!! From now on I only walk on hard surfaces.

3 posted on 06/30/2002 10:28:22 PM PDT by jellybean
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: luvbach1
interesting...
4 posted on 07/01/2002 5:52:29 AM PDT by kinsman redeemer
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: gcruse
Arg! Don't tell the women or they'll balloon up more than ever!
5 posted on 07/01/2002 8:54:48 AM PDT by balrog666
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: gcruse
When my father was a resident at Bellevue hospital, he frequently observed another doctor perform a morning ritual. There was a standard sliding-weight scale in the doctor's break room (coffee room). This fellow would weigh himself. Then he would repeat the weighing--only standing on his left foot. Then again on his right foot.

He invariably did this, every single morning.

He was Chief of Psychiatry at the hospital!

--Boris

6 posted on 07/02/2002 8:48:29 AM PDT by boris
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: boris
LOL !!!
7 posted on 07/02/2002 9:29:58 AM PDT by gcruse
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: gcruse
Jerrold Nadler would be an anorexic on the Moon.
8 posted on 07/03/2002 9:36:01 AM PDT by TrappedInLiberalHell
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: boris
Then he would repeat the weighing--only standing on his left foot. Then again on his right foot.

It's not as crazy as it sounds. My left side is stronger and bigger than my right side (left eye, left arm, left leg). I notice when I lean to the right, the weight goes up a pound or two. I think center-of-mass may explain this. If it's not over the center of the scale, the reading will be less. I would think that leaning far left (not politically, mind you!), then far right, and taking the mean (average) of the two readings, you would derive the weight closest to your actual weight. Any mechanical engineers or physicists out there that can confirm or refute this theory?

9 posted on 07/03/2002 9:43:08 AM PDT by TrappedInLiberalHell
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: TrappedInLiberalHell
 If it's not over the center of the
scale, the reading will be less.

Whoa.  I would have said, "No way"
before posting this article, but having
learned something of the mechanics
of scales since then, I don't know.

10 posted on 07/03/2002 12:48:47 PM PDT by gcruse
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson