Is this supposed to be edifying? Is it supposed to be enlightening? Is it supposed to be an offering of eroticism?
Well, needless to say I don't need your review to know that I won't be wasting my time on this junk. But I do think you've made it clear for anyone who might entertain the thought of viewing this tripe. Let's hope they're listening. As far as I am concerned Richard can take his collective movie efforts and stuff them where the sun don't shine. I had thought Diane Lane had a little more sense than to involve herself in this type of stuff. Evidently I was wrong.
Why pay to help Hollywood glamorize adultery?