Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

To: dpwiener
For the life of me, I can't understand what would be the point of going to see a movie that painfully portrays the destruction of a family. Watching someone's wife soil herself with another man isn't entertainment to me. If I want sex I can find the real thing, I don't need to see it denegrated in this manner.

Is this supposed to be edifying? Is it supposed to be enlightening? Is it supposed to be an offering of eroticism?

Well, needless to say I don't need your review to know that I won't be wasting my time on this junk. But I do think you've made it clear for anyone who might entertain the thought of viewing this tripe. Let's hope they're listening. As far as I am concerned Richard can take his collective movie efforts and stuff them where the sun don't shine. I had thought Diane Lane had a little more sense than to involve herself in this type of stuff. Evidently I was wrong.

7 posted on 05/10/2002 2:57:31 PM PDT by DoughtyOne
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: DoughtyOne
I couldn't have said it better myself.

Why pay to help Hollywood glamorize adultery?

15 posted on 05/10/2002 4:12:35 PM PDT by occam's chainsaw
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson