Click here: to donate by Credit Card
Or here: to donate by PayPal
Or by mail to: Free Republic, LLC - PO Box 9771 - Fresno, CA 93794
Thank you very much and God bless you.
Posted on 10/26/2026 6:01:31 AM PDT by Twotone
A single glacier sitting at the bottom of the world may be all that is holding back catastrophic amounts of sea level rise. As it melts away faster than ever, scientists are racing to get a better understanding of when it might fail. Unfortunately, they’ve recently found more bad news.
This Antarctic bulwark known as Thwaites, or the “Doomsday Glacier,” is gargantuan – roughly the size of Florida – and holds enough ice to push the planet’s coastlines up two feet. But the edge of Thwaites also acts as a cork, holding up the rim of the West Antarctic ice sheet, much of which sits below sea level. As Thwaites deteriorates, more ice in this bowl becomes exposed to the ocean a, creating a feedback loop that makes it melt faster. And if Thwaites were to succumb entirely, the whole interior of the sheet might follow suit, rising sea levels by as much as 10 feet.
It’s easy to track Thwaites’ demise from space, but predicting its future has been much trickier. For years, computer models used to simulate Thwaites’ retreat weren’t able to pass the simple test of accurately recreating the retreat that satellites have captured over the last few decades, marking them unreliable tools for looking ahead.
But now, scientists have plugged in a major missing piece. A new paper, published in Nature Communications earlier this month, appears to be the first to account for what’s happening underneath Thwaites to simulate how quickly it may lose ice. Using this model to simulate the future paints a grim picture: Thwaites could contribute twice as much to sea level rise by the end of the century as previously projected.
“There are many other unknowns, but this solves a specific and very important piece of the puzzle,” said Mattia Poinelli, a glaciologist at the University of California Los Angeles and first author of the paper.
The problem area is where the icy underbelly of Thwaites rests on the seabed, known as the grounding zone. Only relatively recently did scientists realize this zone was not a fixed boundary, but one that oscillates with the tides. As it bobs up and down, warm water pushes underneath the glacier — creating cracks and miles-long channels that allow even more melting.
Previous simulations of how Thwaites might melt didn’t account for this dynamic, Poinelli said. By doing so, his team’s model was able to match the changes to the glacier that satellites had observed. It also showed that Thwaites could become permanently unpinned from the seafloor as early as 2038, with a 60 percent chance that this could happen by the end of the century, an eventuality which would likely cause the melting to ratchet up even more.
If the climate remains as warm as it is now, the model shows that Thwaites would be on track to add three centimeters of sea level rise by the end of the century. That may not sound like much, but it doubles the projections made by previous models, according to the study. Thwaites contributes about 4 percent to sea level rise which, over the past three decades, amounts to some 10 centimeters. That’s enough to have sent homes in North Carolina crashing into the sea, while forcing coastal communities in places like the Solomon Islands and Senegal to move to higher ground.
Of course, global warming is not holding steady but rather continuing to ramp up, with each decade expected to be hotter than the one before. As a result, the world should brace for even more melt than the model predicts, Poinelli said.
But what if humans get their act together and slow down climate change, or find a way to safely cool the oceans with geoengineering? A separate study, published in Geophysical Research Letters in July, used a model that tested this kind of hypothetical scenario with Thwaites and its comparably large neighbor, the Pine Island glacier, the fastest melting glacier in Antarctica.
Added together, the two glaciers account for the bulk of sea level rise coming from Antarctica. Ocean melt is the primary culprit, so the researchers “switched it off completely” in their model as a way of understanding the condition of each glacier, said Rosie Williams, an ice sheet modeler at the British Antarctic Survey and lead author of the paper.
For all their similarities, it turns out that Pine Island and Thwaites would respond very differently, according to the study. In cooler ocean temperatures, Pine Island would be able to recover ice within a decade, and eventually regrow to where it was 80 years ago – in part thanks to its relatively intact outer shelf. Thwaites, on the other hand, would keep losing ice and raising sea levels worldwide for at least 150 years. The researchers hypothesize that’s because Thwaites is in much worse shape, with the eastern half significantly diminished and the western half disintegrated into many icebergs. While the speed of ice loss would slow down, the glacier may be doomed even in this fictional best-case scenario.
But “that doesn’t mean there’s nothing we can do,” Williams said. Each fraction of a degree of warming makes a difference in how quickly Thwaites disintegrates, and lowering greenhouse-gas emissions could protect other glaciers around Antarctica. “The more we can slow it down,” she said, “the longer we have to adapt to any change that’s coming.”
|
|
Click here: to donate by Credit Card Or here: to donate by PayPal Or by mail to: Free Republic, LLC - PO Box 9771 - Fresno, CA 93794 Thank you very much and God bless you. |
I was under the impression that water displacement occurs under and on top of the water, so it doesn’t matter if the glacier is floating or on the bottom it still displaces the same amount by volume.
IOW, we need to tax EVERYBODY to make sure we can stop this monster!
Yea, whatever
Increased Muslim immigration and communism can probably solve this problem.
One of the few things I learned in my high school physics class.
The example the teacher used was filling a glass with ice then filling it to the rim with water.
Once the ice melted, the water didn't overflow the rim, it stayed the same level.
What a bullsh*t conclusion these non-scientists make. This is coming from a 40+ year real scientist.
Also, if DC gets submerged, it might not be a such bad thing after all
Now you did it you ended the panic alert for a fame seeker.
The data for this article comes from a publication called Nature Communications. Starting October 2014, Nature Communications only accepted submissions from authors willing to pay for the articles being published. This article was published by the Joint Institute for Regional Earth System Science & Engineering. The mission of the JIRESSE is described on its own web page studying the effects of Climate Change on Southern California weather and the impact of climate change on coastlines. The institute profits by suggesting that “climate change” is going to destroy the coastline. Hence, the institute has a vested interest in paying for publications that make their way into other publications like Grist that create climate scares, especially related to teh coast being submerged.
But if we take action now there is no doubt, we "would" restore the glaciers.
Ice actually takes up less space than the water from which it is made. Water expands at near-freezing temperatures. That’s why ice floats.
More space
CORRECT
ALSO IF YOU FILL A GLASS WITH ICE CUBES & ADD WATER==WITH NOTHING ABOVE THE RIM OF THE GLASS ==AS THE ICE MELTS, THE LEVEL OF WATER GOES DOWN.
IT HAS BEEN SO LONG SINCE WE “FILLED ICE CUBE TRAYS” & KIDS LEARNED THAT FROZEN WATER WAS MORE BULK THAN PLAIN WATER-—THIS GETS ALL TANGLED UP.
YOU NEVER FILL TRAYS TO THE VERY RIM-—SPACE WAS NEEDED FOR THE ICE CUBES TO “GROW”.
THIS INFO IS VERY BASIC-—AND KIDS ARE NOT LEARNING ANYTHING
I STILL HAVE SUCH TRAYS. CAN USE THEM IF NEEDED.
NOTHING THIS SIMPLE IS BEING TAUGHT IN SCHOOLS TODAY.
Still at 4.68 years on the climate doom clock? I got some gigs lined up so.......... 🤔😂👍🇺🇸
From the screed - uh, I mean ‘article’...
“may be...
might...
if...
might...
predicting...
appears to be...
may...
could...
previously projected...
unknowns...
simulations...
might...
could...
60 percent chance...
could happen...
eventuality which would likely cause...
Of course...
world should brace...”
This is what is presented as science these days...
Keep your eyes on one data point of a complex system.
evidently some money is still supporting climate change.
rise two feet in florida.
Not so sure. Aren’t the French ‘students’ exacerbating the problem with all the burning spontaneously occurring near their protests? 🙄
Previous simulations of how Thwaites might melt
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.