Click here: to donate by Credit Card
Or here: to donate by PayPal
Or by mail to: Free Republic, LLC - PO Box 9771 - Fresno, CA 93794
Thank you very much and God bless you.
Posted on 10/09/2026 9:44:00 PM PDT by SeekAndFind
Elon Musk is moving closer to competing for the monthly cellphone bill that millions of Americans pay to AT&T, Verizon and T-Mobile. SpaceX has agreed to acquire a nationwide wireless spectrum portfolio that would help its Starlink Mobile business expand service from both satellites and equipment on the ground.
The announcement came Thursday, October 8, and the stock-market reaction continued Friday morning. MarketWatch reported Verizon shares down approximately 6%, with AT&T and T-Mobile each down about 9% in morning trading. Those figures are an intraday snapshot, rather than closing prices.
For consumers, the potential payoff is more competition and better coverage. For investors who own telecom stocks for their dividends, the question is whether a new competitor could eventually put pressure on the profits supporting those payments.
SpaceX reached a definitive agreement to acquire all of investment firm Grain Management’s nationwide 800 MHz spectrum portfolio. Completion remains subject to Federal Communications Commission approval and other closing conditions. Grain announced the transaction on October 8.
Spectrum is the licensed radio capacity that wireless networks use to carry signals. Acquiring those rights gives SpaceX an important ingredient for expanding its mobile business, although it still needs to deploy the infrastructure that makes the service work.
The companies did not disclose financial terms. Reuters reported that The Wall Street Journal, citing people familiar with the matter, put the purchase price at approximately $8 billion in cash. That amount remains a reported figure rather than a publicly confirmed deal price.
There is also an interesting connection to one of SpaceX’s potential competitors: Grain acquired the spectrum from T-Mobile in August through a transaction involving cash and other spectrum assets. It is now proposing to transfer that portfolio to SpaceX.
SpaceX’s regulatory filing describes a hybrid network combining satellite connectivity with terrestrial wireless service. Its ground deployments would use radios and antennas mounted on towers, rooftops and other structures. The proposed system would connect to standard consumer devices.
The low-band spectrum is valuable because of its ability to cover longer distances and penetrate buildings and other obstacles. SpaceX says it would use those characteristics to improve coverage in rural areas, urban environments and indoors. Those are the company’s stated objectives; actual performance will depend on deployment and testing.
That distinction matters for anyone imagining an immediate nationwide replacement for their current carrier. A spectrum agreement advances the project, but consumers still need answers about monthly prices, supported phones, data speeds and when the expanded service will reach their area.
For now, it gives households a reason to watch the rollout. It provides little basis for changing an existing phone plan.
Wireless carriers collect recurring payments from customers, making their businesses attractive to investors looking for dependable cash flow. A capable new entrant could challenge that model through lower prices, better coverage or promotions that make switching more appealing.
The financial pressure could develop even before a large number of customers leave. Incumbent carriers might spend more on promotions and network improvements to protect their market share, reducing the cash available for other purposes.
However, the size of Friday’s stock decline should not be confused with an equivalent decline in the companies’ businesses. Customer losses, pricing pressure and higher costs would have to show up in operating results before investors could measure the damage.
Some analysts believe that process will take years. Citi analyst Michael Rollins argued in a Friday research note that SpaceX was unlikely to materially affect the major carriers’ businesses until at least 2029. His view, reported by Barron’s, is an analyst forecast, not a guarantee.
For income investors, the useful measures remain free cash flow, debt obligations and dividend coverage. A falling share price increases the quoted dividend yield when the payout stays unchanged, but that arithmetic alone says little about the investment’s safety.
SpaceX’s ambitions are producing a very different reaction among the companies that own wireless infrastructure. American Tower, Crown Castle and SBA Communications rose Friday as investors anticipated that SpaceX could become another customer leasing space on their towers.
In its report published at 10:23 a.m. Eastern, Benzinga recorded Crown Castle up approximately 10.1%, American Tower up 6.8% and SBA Communications up 5.5%. These were also intraday figures.
Tower owners earn rental income from wireless operators. If SpaceX leases existing sites for its ground network, those companies could collect additional revenue from a new tenant. That creates a potential investment opportunity beyond choosing which cellphone carrier will win.
The opportunity remains conditional. Friday’s rally reflects expectations about future business; it does not establish how many sites SpaceX will lease or which tower owners will secure the contracts.
The next important step is regulatory approval. After that, investors will need concrete information about deployment spending, infrastructure agreements and the consumer offering.
Competitive prices and reliable everyday service would make the threat to incumbent carriers more substantial. Limited availability, expensive plans or a slower rollout would give those companies more time to respond. Tower investors, meanwhile, will want signed leases that turn enthusiasm into revenue.
SpaceX has made a consequential move toward a broader mobile business. Whether it changes your phone bill or the earnings behind your telecom dividends will depend on the network it builds and the customers it attracts.
|
|
Click here: to donate by Credit Card Or here: to donate by PayPal Or by mail to: Free Republic, LLC - PO Box 9771 - Fresno, CA 93794 Thank you very much and God bless you. |
Now if he can make a cell phone like the little ones that would slip into any pocket, with room to spare.
It’s about time.
GabeN is over there mainstreaming Linux on desktops;
Hopefully Elon over here has some hand in mainstreaming Linux on cell phones.
It would be a brutal two-pronged fork to big tech across the board if this came to be what actually happened.
But I still want a big screen for streaming programs and to read documents more easily. Maybe a small phone that unfolds like a road map?
Well ... we’re WAITING!
“But I still want a big screen for streaming programs “
I want a tactile keyboard.
Good. I hope he wipes them out. AT&T is an evil leftist-supporting company. Screw them.
Land lines are still out there but communications totally dependent on satellites would make us vulnerable to an attack. That’s what the government is for.
AT&T to Retire Traditional Landlines by 2029 (Except in This State)
https://www.pcmag.com/news/att-to-retire-traditional-landlines-by-2029-except-in-this-state
California is the mystery state in the headline.
” the company’s landline business currently operates in 21 states, and by 2029, it expects the copper networks to be eliminated everywhere except California, where regulators have been fighting to keep the landline business alive.”
Cable tv has it’s own version of landlines.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.