Click here: to donate by Credit Card
Or here: to donate by PayPal
Or by mail to: Free Republic, LLC - PO Box 9771 - Fresno, CA 93794
Thank you very much and God bless you.
Posted on 10/05/2026 5:20:30 PM PDT by simpson96
Claude, it turns out, is not a reliable confidant. According to a report from Gulf Coast Now, a Florida woman was arrested last month for allegedly making threats against local law enforcement in a conversation with Anthropic’s chatbot.
Per the outlet, which cites the arrest report, the 30-year-old woman from Bonita Springs, Florida, was apparently having an ongoing private conversation with Claude in which she made multiple threats directed at the Lee County Sheriff’s Office. The first threat, registered on September 26 at 5:10 AM, she allegedly wrote: “I’m going to shoot up the sheriff’s right the [expletive] now.” In a follow-up message, sent at 1:07 AM on September 27, she said, “This is 100% last chance I’m done. I got a new [expletive] gun today. [Expletive] you.”
Now, let’s set aside any debate as to the seriousness of this threat or conversation about the kind of support a person expressing these types of violent, antisocial behaviors may need, which are serious discussions that deserve thoughtful consideration. Instead, can we just think for a moment about how darkly funny it is to have to wait to send your next threatening message because you hit your token limit for the day?
Ok, with that out of our systems: Per the report, the messages the woman sent were apparently flagged by Anthropic’s automated safety monitoring system, which pings human reviewers any time a message meets a certain risk threshold. Humans reportedly took a look at these specific messages and decided they were serious enough that they should alert law enforcement, and they did.
Anthropic did not immediately respond to request for comment sent by Gizmodo.
Once the authorities were made aware of the messages, they promptly arrested the woman at her residence. She was reportedly taken into custody without any incident and charged with written threats of violence, which is a second-degree felony in Florida and carries a potential penalty of up to 15 years in prison and up to a $10,000 fine.
After her arrest, Lee County Sheriff Carmine Marceno told WINK News that the woman explained to law enforcement that she uses Claude like a “diary.” But Claude obviously does not function quite as privately as she treated it. Per Anthropic’s support documents, the company “does not disclose information about customers or end users of our services in response to government requests except in accordance with valid legal process,” but it does have an exception: “if we believe there is an emergency that may result in imminent physical harm or death, and providing such information without delay may avert that emergency.” It seems this situation rose to that level in the eyes of Anthropic.
The case is a good reminder for those who may treat chatbots as a therapist or a private record of their thoughts: you are not just typing into the ether. What you say is subject to being used not just to potentially train a model but, in certain circumstances, can even be shared with law enforcement without your consent.
So if you have some ultimately impotent rage that you just need to get off your chest, first seek out some real resources that can help rather than a chatbot that is far more qualified to be a stenographer than a psychiatrist. And if you need some immediate relief, maybe try shouting it into a pillow. Just make sure you don’t have an Alexa in the room.
|
|
Click here: to donate by Credit Card Or here: to donate by PayPal Or by mail to: Free Republic, LLC - PO Box 9771 - Fresno, CA 93794 Thank you very much and God bless you. |
What happens on AI doesn’t stay on AI……..
Look like booze and AI don’t mix.
I would think “written threats of violence” only applies if the perp sends it to the victim themselves, such as if you write a particularly nasty nastygram and message/email/mail it to the target.
Coming from a tool like Claude, it’d be like a hearsay accusation, even if it is logged.
I’d be curious to see how this gets defended in court, but the chick will likely just plead down.
The old advice was: Write an angry letter telling someone exactly what you thought of them. Then put the letter in a drawer and do not mail it.
But now it seems like your stationary supplies will notify that person and say, “You won’t believe what she said about you ...”
[What happens on AI doesn’t stay on AI…….]
Apparently
This would not be a crime under common law, so I asked Google what’s up with Florida:
“If a person writes a violent thought in a password-protected digital document or a physical diary, and a hacker or a snooping relative finds it and hands it to the police, common law states that no crime occurred because there was no intent to communicate a threat to the target.
How Florida Deliberately Changed the Law
Florida completely upended this standard with an amendment to Florida Statute § 836.10.
Before 2021, the statute read that it was a crime to send a threat “to any person”. Under that old wording, the defense could easily argue that typing a threat into an AI chatbot was not sending it “to a person”.
Because of this exact loophole, Florida lawmakers rewrote the statute to make it a crime to send, post, or transmit a threat:
“...in any manner in which it may be viewed by another person.”
By changing the phrasing from “sending it to a person” to “sending it in a manner where it may be viewed by another person,” Florida lawmakers intentionally removed the requirement that the threat ever reach the intended victim’s ears.”
Of course liberals love to call the traditional elements (requirements) of a crime “loopholes.”
She hurls the ‘F’ word at her ‘diary’?
Arguing with a Claude system is like arguing with her own reflection in a mirror. I’ve seen drunk people do it for a moment or two.
I somehow doubt if soft rock singer David Gates had the same kind of motivation when he sang that song called “Diary”
back in 1978.
Anthropic, the same AI that Trump and Hegseth rejected after the ceo wanted assurances that it wouldn’t be used against humans without human consent?
The case is a good reminder for those who may treat chatbots as a therapist or a private record of their thoughts: you are not just typing into the ether.
GNS
And that’s a little scary.
I don’t know that any real crime was committed except in a Minority Report sort of way...
What’s next? WORD reporting letters you never send?
Soon you will need a white room to express yourself verbally.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.