Click here: to donate by Credit Card
Or here: to donate by PayPal
Or by mail to: Free Republic, LLC - PO Box 9771 - Fresno, CA 93794
Thank you very much and God bless you.
Posted on 10/05/2026 8:52:26 AM PDT by Miami Rebel
Israel’s Supreme Court ruling upholding the right of Arab parties to run in the Oct. 27 election could make it more difficult for Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu to form a new coalition after the election. In a unanimous decision, the Supreme Court ruled on Friday that the Joint Arab List and Ra’am, the two Arab-led political lists competing in Israel’s elections, could run. The ruling overturned a decision by the Central Elections Committee, a largely political body in which parties in Netanyahu’s right-wing coalition hold a majority of the seats, which had voted last month to bar the lists from running.
“The court found that the materials submitted to the Central Elections Committee did not meet the standards established in the case law for disqualifying a list of candidates,” the court said in its ruling, which did not include extensive reasoning. The decision restored the parties that traditionally represent Israel’s more than 2 million Arab citizens and in doing so helped the opposition block. Now a wide constituency that rejects working with Netanyahu will have a reason to head to the polls rather than stay home.
Most polls have shown that the opposition bloc would need to include the parliamentary seats held by the Ra’am party, led by MK Mansour Abbas, in order to gain the lead over Netanyahu’s coalition. Unlike Ra’am, the Joint Arab List has never sat in an Israeli coalition and there is no expectation that it would join with Zionist Jewish-led parties to do so.
The court also took a number of other steps regarding the upcoming election. It overturned the committee’s decision to disqualify Ofer Cassif, a Jewish lawmaker running as part of the Joint List. In Cassif’s case, the decision was made by a 7-2 majority. The Supreme Court justices said they “strongly condemn the outrageous statements and actions by Cassif that evoke revulsion.” At the same time, they ruled that “these statements or actions do not meet the stringent tests established” for disqualifying a candidate. According to the petition seeking Cassif’s disqualification, he had legitimized Palestinian violence during the war, referred to those seeking to attack Israeli soldiers as “freedom fighters” and taken actions against Israel in international legal forums.
The most significant development, however, came in the case of Sami Abu Shehadeh, the leader of Balad, one of the parties that make up the Joint List. During a Thursday hearing, the Supreme Court took the unusual step of indicating to Abu Shehadeh that a majority of the justices were inclined to disqualify him and recommended that he withdraw his candidacy. Following internal consultations, Balad announced that Abu Shehadeh would withdraw his candidacy, rendering the court’s expected ruling on his disqualification moot. “Sami Abu Shehadeh did not retract his positions and did not flee the struggle. Only after the court itself announced its intention to uphold the disqualification did he decide to withdraw his candidacy,” Balad said in an official statement.
A central part of the case against Abu Shehadeh focused on an article he published on Oct. 8, 2023, one day after Hamas’ Oct. 7 attack, in which the terror organization killed 1,200 people in Israel and took another 251 hostage. In the article, Abu Shehadeh described the Oct. 7 events as an “important historic event” and suggested that lessons could be learned from how Hamas had managed to surprise Israel and carry out its invasion. His comments were cited as evidence that he supports armed struggle against Israel, one of the grounds on which candidates can be disqualified under Israeli law. In its ruling, the Supreme Court said there was “a consensus that the things said by Mr. Abu Shehadeh are painful, outrageous and revolting.” The decision to disqualify Abu Shehadeh was also supported by the Democrats, Israel’s most left-wing Zionist party. During the Supreme Court hearing, Abu Shehadeh acknowledged that “this paragraph was not written correctly.” He said, “I have never supported violence in my life,” and said that he knows victims of the Oct. 7 attack. Balad said Abu Shehadeh would continue to lead the party’s political activities even without serving in the Knesset.
The Joint List sharply criticized the court’s handling of the case. In a statement, the list said that “the heart of the matter” was “preventing an Arab political leader from running in the elections and infringing on our public’s right to choose its representatives.” The list accused the court of acting “following a campaign of incitement and political persecution led by the fascist and Kahanist right, joined by the leaders of the Zionist opposition parties.”
“The court must bear responsibility for its disgraceful decision before our public and before public opinion in Israel and around the world, for providing judicial cover for political exclusion. This ruling is another link in the chain of persecution of our public.”
Right-wing Israeli politicians also criticized the court for declining to issue a ruling formally disqualifying Abu Shehadeh rather than merely pressing him to withdraw. National Security Minister Itamar Ben-Gvir, an ultranationalist member of Netanyahu’s government, called the court’s proposal “too merciful” and said it “harms the democracy of the State of Israel.”
|
|
Click here: to donate by Credit Card Or here: to donate by PayPal Or by mail to: Free Republic, LLC - PO Box 9771 - Fresno, CA 93794 Thank you very much and God bless you. |
Some Apartheid Country they are.
Israel supreme court justices are in part appointed by representatives of Law Associations that are not responsible or elected/appointed by the voters of Israel.
Israel is not a full democracy. They are in fact an oligarchy in part subject to the standards set by unelected Law Associations.
Israel should just go ahead and declare the West Bank and Gaza as solely Israeli territory. Disband the PA and make new election districts in those areas.
Most polls have shown that the opposition bloc would need to include the parliamentary seats held by the Ra'am party, led by MK Mansour Abbas, in order to gain the lead over Netanyahu’s coalition. Unlike Ra'am, the Joint Arab List has never sat in an Israeli coalition and there is no expectation that it would join with Zionist Jewish-led parties to do so.
"Netanyahu's right-wing coalition" "Zionist Jewish-led"... IOW, jihadist media shill.
The intransigence of the downward-spiraling IRGC and its proxies, including the Houthi scumballs; the French jihadist riots; the attempted hijacking; the DSA surge in the US -- the two Arab lists will split the vote and neither will wind up in any ruling coalition, which btw will be led by Bibi.
I agree.
the borders of what was called Gaza and the West Bank back when they were controlled by Egypt and Jordan were just cease fire lines, nothing more.
Once war resumed in 1967 the cease fire lines were literally pushed back to the permanent borders of Egypt and Jordan.
The “green line” has no real meaning outside of a historical context. The British mandate of Palestine was a full territory. Fully controlled by Britain then, fully controlled by Israel now.
I am not suprised. As stated, this ruling would likely hurt Netanyahu. In my opinion, the judicial and the majority of Israeli media, are left wing.
“Israel should just go ahead and declare the West Bank and Gaza as solely Israeli territory. Disband the PA and make new election districts in those areas.”
And allow everyone living there to vote in Knesset elections?
It took a supreme court ruling at the 11th hour to overturn the outright ban on Arab parties representing 7 million voters from participating in Israel's so-called democratic process...but ok.
If the territories are annexed why not? Is Israel a democracy or not?
That is the tension. The Arabs would have to be given the vote. But if they can vote, how can the country’s identity as a Jewish state survive? There is no easy solution.
With half the population being Arab, why should its identity as a Jewish state survive?
Yes.
More of that Israeli fascism. /S
“ And allow everyone living there to vote in Knesset elections?”
No. Every last one of those savages should be shoved into Egypt at gunpoint.
L
Israel should just go ahead and declare the West Bank and Gaza as solely Israeli territory. Disband the PA and make new election districts in those areas.
**********************
Why?
They already consider it Israeli territory.
The problem for Israel is those lands have a huge majority Arab population, hence the military occupation.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.