Posted on 10/03/2026 8:10:47 AM PDT by MtnClimber
The Democrat Party is co-opting its socialist insurgents to defeat Trump and the GOP—but inviting ideological extremists into the fold could threaten the party’s future.
This is the final installment of a two-part series. The first installment can be found here.
Like Germany’s center-right Christian Democratic Union (CDU), America’s center-left Democrat Party faces a challenge from its extreme flank.
Unlike the CDU, which has abandoned its past strategy and adopted one of confrontation, the Democrat Party is sticking with its strategy of co-option—not fusion—with the Democratic Socialists of America (DSA).
But will the Democrat Party’s strategy prove any more successful in staving off its possible extinction than the CDU’s?
Presently, the Democrat Party has a ringside seat at the continuing struggle between the GOP establishment and President Trump and his MAGA movement, which constitutes a halting attempt at fusion. This occurs when the party establishment and its insurgents, be they internal or external, join together to defeat a common enemy or promote a common position. The fusion can be an ephemeral alliance of convenience or a more lasting union between the two factions, wherein each accepts the ground rules for mutual coexistence going forward.
In co-option, however, one faction, usually the larger party, remains dominant, and on its own terms entices into it the nascent party of the ideological insurgents. Such a political union is to be enduring and often entails buying off the leadership of the insurgents and, for the less venal among them, agreeing to champion some of the now former insurgents’ policy goals.
For example, consider the GOP establishment’s co-option strategy toward the Tea Party. The GOP was able to successfully integrate large swaths of the Tea Party movement’s agenda and supporters into its ranks (indeed, at the zenith of the Tea Party, the GOP nominated Mitt Romney as its standard-bearer with nary a peep from these activists).
Alternatively, having lost in its initial confrontational stance toward Donald Trump and his MAGA movement, early in the administration the GOP establishment unsuccessfully sought to co-opt the new president and his movement. When this proved equally unsuccessful, what has transpired is a mutual attempt at a hostile fusion between the two movements, each disdaining the very name of the other political faction and loath to apply it to themselves. Indeed, at present the state of the GOP and MAGA’s fusion efforts is more akin to a defense against a hostile takeover.
This is what the Democrat Party establishment and rank and file seek to avoid.
The Democrat Party is challenged by the Democratic Socialists of America (DSA), “the enemy within.” DSA candidates contest and win Democrat Party primaries. This is due to America’s “two-party system,” which only affords the practical, if however improbable, opportunity for a new “party” to take over an existing party from within rather than from without.
Consequently, the insurgent wing of the party utilizes a strategy of initial grassroots subversion to infiltrate and capture the rank-and-file membership and, ultimately, usurp the old party’s leadership. The choice facing the Democrat establishment, then, is to either oppose the DSA by endeavoring to dry up its money and defeat its candidates in Democrat primaries or to try to co-opt the DSA’s agenda and candidates, especially the successful ones, prior to, during, or after an election.
Having long sought to put a moderate veneer on its extreme agenda, the Democrats are determined to prevent the DSA and its radical leftist insurgents from capturing and becoming the public face of their party. This, as the party did in 2020. To defeat their despised President Trump, the Democrat Party engaged in an uneasy fusion with Bernie Sanders progressives to elect Joe Biden. Succinctly, the candidate was the moderate public face who served as the Trojan horse containing the progressives’ radical agenda.
Now, in the 2026 midterms, the Democrats are again opposed by President Trump and his GOP Congressional majority. And, once more, President Trump and his “Make America Great Again” (MAGA) movement serve an unwittingly conciliatory purpose between the Democrat Party and the DSA.
In this latest marriage of connivance, after numerous failed attempts at confrontation during the primary season, the Democrat Party’s leadership has embraced DSA candidates who have won their primaries for two reasons.
First, the obvious, overriding need to defeat President Trump, the GOP, and MAGA.
Secondly, to continue their stealth strategy of co-opting DSA members by incorporating them and some of their less electorally noxious policies into the Democrat Party.
The danger for the Democrat Party? A strategy of co-option can be the path of least resistance and, in the short term, provide measures of electoral success. But deliberately hosting such ideological extremists within your ranks is risky. Yes, such a co-option strategy can work. But it can also prove akin to injecting cancer cells into your party’s body politic and, in the long term, metastasize and kill it.
And the last thing the Democrat Party wants to do is emulate the “strange death” of England’s Liberal Party, the desiccated corpse of which was stuffed into history’s dustbin by the emergent Labour Party.
As with Germany’s CDU and Social Democratic Party of Germany (SPD), both the Democrat Party and GOP establishments are under populist pressures from both extremist flanks. The issues and attacks upon both countries’ centrist parties are very similar, too: such as socialism and expropriations to alleviate affordability concerns; nativist appeals to xenophobic and anti-Semitic views; and an overarching failure by the political center to articulate a lack of forward-looking, aspirational visions for both nations. (As noted, MAGA is by definition a paean to hearken back, not a call to charge ahead.)
Thus, what we see in challenges to and the strategies of both Germany’s and America’s political centers is how, in the age of instant communication, instant gratification is becoming the norm, and patience is becoming a rarer virtue. And in the bustling hedgerow of politics, teeming with venality and vice and occasional virtue, there is cause to be alarmed. For when the center does not deliver, desperate people seek out extremes.
And hard times impend to test both countries, and try our souls.
Dear FRiends,
We need your continuing support to keep FR funded. Your donations are our sole source of funding. No sugar daddies, no advertisers, no paid memberships, no commercial sales, no gimmicks, no tax subsidies. No spam, no pop-ups, no ad trackers.
If you enjoy using FR and agree it's a worthwhile endeavor, please consider making a contribution today:
Click here: to donate by Credit Card
Or here: to donate by PayPal
Or by mail to: Free Republic, LLC - PO Box 9771 - Fresno, CA 93794
Thank you very much and God bless you,
Jim
Being in the center between good and evil is no virtue.
One of the most famous lines from possibly the most famous song in rock & roll history sung by the greatest band to ever walk the earth is part of the title but the title of that song is not even identified in the article??
ohhh- it makes me wonder....
If you don’t value personal freedom, personal choice, personal responsibility, and the right under God to self-determine, then leave America. There are plenty of places on the planet where those things aren’t supported, and government (or the ‘theocracy’) has a much larger hand in your life. Go to one of those if that is what you want. Do not come to America or stay in America if you don’t want to truly be American. As a nation, we deserve better.
When you use the word ‘diversity’, realize that this term has relative meaning. It is most definitely NOT automatically a strength, and as with invasive biological species it can be highly destructive.
If there’s a bustle in your hedgerow, don’t be alarmed now
It’s just a spring clean for the May queen
Yes, there are two paths you can go by, but in the long run
There’s still time to change the road you’re on.
– Led Zeppelin
Creatures in the middle of the road are best known as...
Road kill.
Thanks for posting. Interesting observations from Thaddeus “as we wind on down the road”.
And there's still time to change the road you're on
Does this mean that there is still time for dimocRATs to become rational beings?
One thing missed in this article is that the socialists have been the rudder of the Democrat party at least since Franklin Roosevelt. Almost never has there been a problem that couldn’t be solved by more government control and ownership. The party backslid from the leftward march occasionally, like Truman easing economic controls after WW2 and Kennedy’s tax cuts, but in general it has been a history of more, more, more without having to raise the Soviet flag and march in the streets.
And it makes me wonder.....
Out of time. These irrational satan followers are on a Highway to Hell.
Its a battle of Socialist vs Communist, either party hates the future and continues bankrupting America. There is no respite on spending and the side effects of such actions.
The only thing you can do is prepare your families and friends, have plans and expect these parties to continue destroying America.
Yes, they are always flirting with disaster.
In this day and age, there is no reason to be this far off the mark, AI is your friend. Per Grok:
"Even after becoming the presumptive nominee, enthusiasm lagged. Polls showed weaker intensity of support compared with Barack Obama’s base. There were visible protests and friction at the convention from Ron Paul supporters, and post-election, many Republicans quickly distanced themselves from Romney. Some contemporary commentary described the nomination as grudging rather than celebratory."
Nobody cared or liked Romney, he was just a vote against Obama.
Republican factions cannot be compared to Democrat factions.
Republican factions are of 2 types.
1) One type of faction is over ideology and issues:
We are mostly agreed on pro-life and pro-2d Amendment.
We disagree on foreign policy; America First vs saving the world.
We disagree on Capitalism. Les socialism vs a little more socialism ...but give it a Madison Ave name.
We disagree on Big government...Centralize our agenda in DC vs decentralize.
2) A 2d type of Republican faction is the SWAMP and fraud.
Some seek to advance personal power and wealth thru government.
The Democrat factions are of only 1 type.
1) Rare is the Democrat who wants government to spend money efficiently. The SWAMP is OK as long as our side controls the swamp and controls the Republicans in the swamp.
2) Democrats are split on Ukraine..or any war. Democrats disagree on who should benefit the most from the swamp...the poor on welfare or the intelligentsia. Democrats will always compromise on who gets what slice of the pie to support the swamp. Thus welfare money goes to the intelligentsia to study the poor and pontificate on the poor.
Don't get all bent out of shape about it.
It's just a spring clean for the May Queen.
there are 3, arguably 4, better songs on that same album
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.