——>Has this been determined to BE a ‘structure’ yet?
I also suggest you look up the Webster dictionary definition of “structure”
That process has now concluded that the object under the Durupınar mound is not a natural rock formation, but a large organized man-made object with corridors, chambers and hallways inside.
What I can say from the radar is that it is organized, it is structural, and a solid geological mass would not have returned such a strong signature.’
Bakhtar said the new radar images do not look like ordinary rock, mudflow or a solid natural hill in Turkey.
Bakhtar told the Daily Mail in a statement that the radar is designed to hide ordinary natural features such as rock and highlight buried structures, open spaces and man-made materials.
‘Natural ground does not organize itself into corridors, chambers and hallways,’ Dr Bakhtar explained.
‘The system was built to separate buried structure from host geology, tunnels, voids, worked materials, discontinuities. That is what it is seeing here. A solid geological mass would not have returned this signature.’
CLAIM: That process has now concluded that the object under the Durupınar mound is not a natural rock formation, but a large organized man-made object with corridors, chambers and hallways inside
ME: Izzat so??
The recent claims come from the Noah's Ark Scans team working at the Durupınar site. They report that radar surveys detected anomalies that they interpret as possible chambers, corridors, tunnels, and structural layers beneath the formation. However, even reports favorable to the project note that radar data alone do not prove the features are man-made. [ibtimes.co.uk], [hindustantimes.com]
A key distinction:
One article summarizing the 2026 work specifically states that radar revealed features the team interprets as corridors and chambers, but adds that those interpretations have not established that the features are man-made and that physical sampling is required to determine what caused the radar signatures. [ibtimes.co.uk]
Another report notes that researchers claimed to have "100 percent confirmed" a man-made object, but immediately states that the findings have not established that the site is Noah's Ark and that additional scientific testing is still required. [hindustantimes.com]
So the most accurate wording today would be:
Researchers investigating the Durupınar site claim radar data reveals subsurface anomalies consistent with possible corridors, chambers, and other organized structures, but independent confirmation that the formation is a large man-made object has not yet been established. [ibtimes.co.uk], [hindustantimes.com]
As an artifact-forensics question, this is the same distinction we often make with coins or archaeological objects:"interesting pattern" is not the same as "proven identification." The radar results may be genuinely interesting, but the decisive evidence would be recovered physical material, excavation data, repeatable measurements, and peer-reviewed analysis. So far, the public reports are still at the anomaly-detection stage.