Posted on 09/27/2026 1:38:53 PM PDT by ransomnote
Susan Kokinda
@SusanKokindaa
Parody account
2 Trump Just Cracked Iran After 47 Years-1 #trend #flyp: #top #foryou #viral #trending
NOTES AND QUOTES BEGIN~~~
Susan Kokinda: ....that is not Lindsay Graham's regime change, and Donald Trump made that very clear in an aside at the G7 summit.
At the G7, Trump was asked what he would say to Republicans like Lindsay Graham who are sceptical of the MOU.
Trump joked that he would have to talk to Graham, and that Lindsay would be 'in big trouble.'
Kokinda notes that if Lindsay is skeptical about the Memorandum of Understanding (MOU), you can only imagine what he thought of Trump's remarks about Syria and Israel
She says Trump's remarks about Syria were not an accident, and that they were a message.
When Trump said Syria should handle Hezbollah, if Israel can't 'do the job without killing everyone,' Trump directly challenged the imperial architecture which kept the region in turmoil for decades. 'Donald Trump pulled no punches.'
Asked if he was frustrated with Israel, Trump said, 'No,' and that he has a great relationship with Israel. He goes on to note that Israel responded too agressivelly ('vicious' 'too much') to a small drone attack, and said he wasn't pleased at the response.
After suggesting again that Syria should handle Hezbollah better than Israel has, Trump addressed the potential of a FREE Lebanon, free of the Hezbollah threat.
Trump said he's had a great relationship with Bibi, but now Bibi has to be more responsible with respect to Lebanon. Trump spoke about Lebanon's rich culture of intellectuals. Trump says of all countries, Lebanon has been treated the worst. And they can't defend themselves, and they have Hezbollah which is a problem for them.
Trump said he's not happy with the way Israel has handled themselves with Lebannon, and with Hezbollah, it should have been handled faster, but it just goes on forever.
Kokinda says, "That is pure Donald Trump,' recognizing that Lebannon, with it's intellectual history (i.e., the Paris of the Middle East), needs to be itself, liberated from the chessboard. Bibi Netanyahu has not done it, so now maybe Syria should.
Donald Trump does not deal with imperial proxies. He wants to deal with leaders and forces that could potentiallly represent their nation's sovereign interests, which is why he devoted more public press time with the Emir of Qatar and the President of the UAE on the first day of the G7 summit, than he did with the other European leaders.
Those Gulf leaders represent the interests of their countries far more than Kier Starmer, Emmanuel Macron, Friederike Mertz, or Mark Carney do.
Trump's foreign policy operates on the principle of sovereignty, that we have our interests, each nation has its interests and you do not mediate relations through the lens of multilateral or supernational institutions. That contrast was what Mark Carney was complaining about in the run-up to the G7 summit.
Listen to Mark Carney as he concedes that the old order is dead. He gave two speeches in Ireland the week before the G7, and you could call them concession speeches. Listen to him wave off the very institutions that he spent his life serving:
Mark Carney: ....the t-shirt just referenced 'Coalition of the Willing for Ukraine'. We've been there. That's not NATO. It's not the G-whatever that's coming together. It's a group of like minded countries that are committed to supporting Ukraine
~~~END OF NOTES AND QUOTES
Dear FRiends,
We need your continuing support to keep FR funded. Your donations are our sole source of funding. No sugar daddies, no advertisers, no paid memberships, no commercial sales, no gimmicks, no tax subsidies. No spam, no pop-ups, no ad trackers.
If you enjoy using FR and agree it's a worthwhile endeavor, please consider making a contribution today:
Click here: to donate by Credit Card
Or here: to donate by PayPal
Or by mail to: Free Republic, LLC - PO Box 9771 - Fresno, CA 93794
Thank you very much and God bless you,
Jim
These statements by Trump were made in June of this year st the G7 summit in France. A lot has happened in the interim.
“But why not do the job with killing everyone?”
Your moral IQ is at the level of mental retardation.
And please note: I didn’t say that to insult you. My purpose is always to light the fire in your mind.
US tax dollars fund deployment, surveillance, and combat missions aimed at defeating the Islamic State (ISIS) in Iraq and Syria.
Pentagon data shows that a portion of national defense spending goes toward Middle East operations, totaling hundreds of billions of dollars collectively over the course of post-9/11 conflicts.
Brown University, PROVIDENCE, R.I. Cost of War:
More than $2 trillion was spent in Afghanistan.
In its heyday, the Islamic State was able to raise significant amounts of money (perhaps as much as $1 million per day).
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.