Posted on 09/22/2026 11:15:16 AM PDT by ransomnote
Farm Girl Carrie™️👩🌾
@FarmGirlCarrie
·
15h
Why did Trump ban certain members of the press? @sjkokinda of @PrometheanActn does an excellent job summarizing why Trump threw three news organizations out of the White House, and the reason why they were put there in the first place.You’ll want to save this and share it.
TRANSCRIPT BEGINS~~~~~~~President Trump: They're Fake News. They know it. They're put there for a reason.
Susan Kokinda: "They are put there for a reason." That is the most important thing Donald LTrump said when he explained why he threw three news organizations out of the White House, and he punctuated it with this picture.
The corporate press calls it censorship. The Democrats call it dictatorship, and half of Washington is acting like democracy has just died, 'in the dark.'
They're wrong. This has nothing to do with a couple of news outlets having their credentials yanked.
I'm Susan Kokinda, and I had my White House credentials pulled by the Carter administration back in the 1970's, after I challenged Jimmy Carter's relationship to the Trilateral Commission.
So, let's go back to the post that started this.
"Media Outlets shouldn't be able to constantly write or report Fiction and Lies when they're covering the President of the United States, the Trump Administration, or the United States of America. Other Fake News media Outlets to follow" ~ President Trump
Makes sense. The media shouldn't constantly report fiction and lies. That's what any normal person would think.
But what if the very purpose of the modern media and other institutions of society is to have you believe that the fiction and the lies are the truth?
That's what a British Lord named Bertrand Russel laid out in a 1953 book called, "The Impact of Science on Society." In it, he laid out the mission for the scientists under a scientific dictatorship.
The mission was, "To produce an unshakable conviction that snow is black." Not something that you might question, not an opinion, but an unshakable conviction.
Now Bertrand Russel wasn't some minor figure. He was third generation empire. He called for a world government under a scientific elite. He wanted a monopoly on weapons of war. And his family history tells you exactly the kind of world he wanted.
His grandfather, John Russel, was the Prime Minister under Queen Victoria during the Irish Potato Famine, a famine, remember, that Britain's own policies caused, not a potato blight.
And a century later Russell proposed the codification of his grandfather's policies by proposing that food be used as a weapon to control populations in that same book we referenced above.
Remember that, because the question of propaganda control and population control are the hallmarks of Russell's policy, and the empire's policies.
Here's Russel again, on how to deploy mass psychology. He says the power of this has, "been enormously increased," by modern methods of propaganda.
Here's what he said,
"...mass psychology...will make great strides when it is taken up under a scientific dictatorship...Although this science will be diligently studied, it will be rigidly confined to the governing class. The populace will not be allowed to know how its convictions were generated." ~ Bertrand RussellIn other words, you aren't allowed to know where your ideas come from. And the payoff, Russell says, is a government which will be able to, "...control its subjects securely, without the need of armies or policemen."
No tanks. No soldiers. Just a population that's convinced that snow is black, and that is what the enemy is counting on for the midterms.
But that only works in the dark, and Donald Trump doesn't do that. This is a point that Sarah Huckabee Sanders made standing next to the President in the Oval Office.
Sarah Huckabee Sanders: "I think it's hard to argue against a free press when you're literally standing in the Oval Office asking questions of the President....He's been more accessible and easier to talk to than any president in history."
Susan Kokinda: President Trump governs out loud, in front of the cameras, in social media posts, taking questions live.
Russell's whole model depends on nobody seeing the wiring. Trump shows you the wiring on purpose, and now he's ripping out the faulty wiring. That's the difference between policy built to manage a population in the dark versus policy built to benefit a country in the light.
One is the British Imperial system. The other one is the one Donald Trump is defending, namely, the American system.
If that fight is the one you want to fight, subscribe to Promethean Action's free newsletter.
~~~END OF TRANSCRIPT
September 22, 2026
|
Click here: to donate by Credit Card Or here: to donate by PayPal Or by mail to: Free Republic, LLC - PO Box 9771 - Fresno, CA 93794 Thank you very much and God bless you. |
“the Irish Potato Famine, a famine, remember, that Britain’s own policies caused, not a potato blight.”
Why would I remember that? Why would anyone?
The issue here is White House privilege to restrict entry.
Want to see the next round of howling? Propose a reimposition of the Smith-Mundt Act. I'd bet the usual Uniparty suspects would be squealing like stuck pigs.
There was a potato blight, but a deliberate British policy forced the continued export of the food the Irish needed to make up for the shortfall of the potato harvest. Thus, widespread starvation. Some say that this was as an attempt to eliminate a portion of the Irish population.
The point of talking about it is to give an example of what the “empire” was willing to do to control the population. Some say that “covid” was the same sort of thing.
I don’t see President Trump as an Emperor
Sounds good to me!
the Irish Potato Famine, a famine, remember, that Britain’s own policies caused, not a potato blight.”
We were always taught, even back in the good old days, that the potato failure was a mystery, that the potatoes would be fine when dug up, then after a few hours, would turn black and inedible, for an unknown reason. Why, I’ve even heard Ken Burns repeat that!
No wonder the Irish hate the English.
There was a potato blight, but a deliberate British policy forced the continued export of the food the Irish needed to make up for the shortfall of the potato harvest. Thus, widespread starvation. Some say that this was as an attempt to eliminate a portion of the Irish population.
Yes, it was to reduce the Irish population to where the English could take over the land.
It was genocide.
Check out the Bengal Famine of 1943. The British caused it to be so much worse.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Bengal_famine_of_1943
It’s a stain on Churchill’s legacy.
Thanks for the link.
This approach is very useful to understand the swamp.
Contractors, vendors, bureaucrats, political insiders arrange a system where they each use taxpayer money to benefit each other. Then they tell the taxpayer it is OK because they all agreed to it. The textbooks and media say this is the system.... our system and it works....for us inside the swamp.
bump
I remember reading about it, but you didn’t? Policy, not blight, starved the population. The fake news has been in schools for decades. And here we have proof.
Real nice summary there, spintreebob. Thanks.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.