Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

To: MinorityRepublican

IMBW, but I remember Prince Charles promising, once he married Camilla, would never be “Queen” but “Queen Consort” or some other term like that. It’s the same thing.

He and his PR team pulled off a brilliant plan, as she is fully Queen, as always was and is the law no matter what “softening” terminology he promised.

H & M’s return will be done in phases, like cooking a frog in warm water. But it won’t matter, as you said. Although I suspect the overt takeover may well come sooner than 2050. Brits need to seriously consider escaping while they can. JMHO.


19 posted on 09/07/2026 11:00:31 AM PDT by Kalamata
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies ]


To: Kalamata

Any woman who becomes a queen by marriage is a ‘queen consort’. Diana would have been, and the Queen Mother was. Katherine will also be a ‘queen consort’.


20 posted on 09/07/2026 11:17:52 AM PDT by Jamestown1630 ("A Republic, if you can keep it.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies ]

To: Kalamata
Brits need to seriously consider escaping while they can. JMHO.

There's still time for them to move to Australia.

24 posted on 09/07/2026 12:04:21 PM PDT by MinorityRepublican
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson