Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Trump’s Quietly Working to Give Part of Yosemite to a Private Developer
NOTUS ^ | 8/28/26 | Carlos Avila Gonzalez/San Francisco Chronicle via AP) By Anna Kramer August 28, 2026 05:00 a.m. U

Posted on 08/28/2026 3:09:10 PM PDT by Libloather

For more than a year, the National Park Service has been quietly working to fulfill an unprecedented directive from Trump officials: Parcel off a corner of Yosemite National Park to give to a private developer.

National Park Service staff in California and Washington, D.C., are trying to arrange a land exchange between a Nevada-based company and the federal government, according to four people directly familiar with discussions, as well as agency documents reviewed by NOTUS.

Since the spring of 2025, the Trump administration has been looking into ways it could cede a roughly quarter-mile strip of land inside Yosemite to a company that, through a web of limited-liability companies, is operated by real-estate developer and investment firm Kingsbarn Realty Capital. Officials are proposing the Park Service give up the land or “interest” in the land in the form of an easement, and in return receive land of equal value somewhere in California that has yet to be decided.

The private developers own an 83-acre plot of land just outside the western boundaries of Yosemite, about five miles from one of the park’s defining ancient sequoia groves. Jeff Pori, the CEO of Kingsbarn, wants to build a short road connecting the property to one of Yosemite’s central thoroughfares. The new road would give the land exceptionally rare private access to a park that is otherwise almost entirely buffered by national forests.

(Excerpt) Read more at notus.org ...


TOPICS: Outdoors; Pets/Animals; Science; Travel
KEYWORDS: blackrock; developer; park; private; yosemite

Click here: to donate by Credit Card

Or here: to donate by PayPal

Or by mail to: Free Republic, LLC - PO Box 9771 - Fresno, CA 93794

Thank you very much and God bless you.

Over 850 old park trees were destroyed for Hussein's flak tower and basketball emporium. Even the locals didn't want it.
1 posted on 08/28/2026 3:09:10 PM PDT by Libloather
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: Libloather

Why not sell plots in the volcanic caldera to the Chinese?


2 posted on 08/28/2026 3:11:49 PM PDT by PTBAA
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Libloather

This is stupid. Even if it’s a short 1/4 road.

I remember being annoyed by all of the giant RVs clogging the roads at the Grand Canyon years ago. Parks need to have that crap outside the park or at least limited to certain areas. If people want to see the sites up close, Parks should have families rent a golf cart to see the sites.

I paying for these Parks. I don’t want to sit behind a Prevost on a 2-lane road going 10mph with the left blinker on and having no idea where to go.


3 posted on 08/28/2026 3:18:35 PM PDT by Hoboto (I blame Hippies.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Libloather

Exchange of federal land for private land the government wants elsewhere is not new.

It is often done and usually makes the federal boundaries smoother.

83 acres is not much. The article does not say how much the federal government gets in the exchange. It might be two or three times as many acres.


4 posted on 08/28/2026 3:18:43 PM PDT by marktwain (----------------------)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Libloather

To distract from the project to develop a certain big tourist attraction in Arizona as
The Trump Grand Canyon: A Barron Trump Development Zone.


5 posted on 08/28/2026 3:20:38 PM PDT by frank ballenger (There's a battle outside and it's raging. It'll soon shake your windows and rattle your walls. )
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Libloather
The new road would give the land exceptionally rare private access to a park that is otherwise almost entirely buffered threatened by national forests.

Fixed. Getting roads to sequoia stands will help us get out the white fir that has invaded them because of over a century of fire suppression. Fire in that fir would kill not a few of those ancient trees.

It only takes a cambium temperature of 140 degrees F for ten minutes or so to kill a tree. THAT is the reason for the thick bark on Sequoiadendron giganteum. Unlike coast redwood, sequoias do not sprout epicormic buds after fire and are therefore much more subject to injury pursuant to a crown fire.

6 posted on 08/28/2026 3:22:38 PM PDT by Carry_Okie (The tree of liberty needs a rope.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

Comment #7 Removed by Moderator

To: Libloather

As opposed to loudly working on it? Give me a break. He could give the whole park away and nobody would care.


8 posted on 08/28/2026 3:27:46 PM PDT by Kleon
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Kleon
He could give the whole park away and nobody would care.

There is "clueless", and then there is profoundly clueless.

9 posted on 08/28/2026 3:32:57 PM PDT by Engraved-on-His-hands (If someone says that there are no absolutes, ask them if they are absolutely sure.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: PTBAA
Why not sell plots in the volcanic caldera to the Chinese?

Good idea but you have to SECRETLY tell them that the caldera has GOLD or JADE. HAS to be secretly and they must PROMISE not to spread that secret.
Guaranteed to sucker them them into it.

10 posted on 08/28/2026 3:59:00 PM PDT by cloudmountain
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Libloather

I’m surprised he hasn’t turned El Capitan into the “Donald J. Trump Bungee Jumping, Zip Line and Water Park”.


11 posted on 08/28/2026 4:04:03 PM PDT by chickenlips (Neuter your politicians )
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Libloather

83 acres. The park is 1,187 square miles. There are 640 acres in a square mile.


12 posted on 08/28/2026 4:26:41 PM PDT by IYAS9YAS (There are two kinds of people: Those who can extrapolate from incomplete data.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Libloather

Unless you are that person who wants to buy that land or President Trump himself, there is nobody that’s going to like that idea of Trump selling off some of Yosemite Nation Park. That will be a legacy burner.


13 posted on 08/28/2026 4:34:39 PM PDT by drypowder
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: marktwain

I don’t believe it’s lawful for any POTUS to sell federal lands. Congress has the authority over selling Federal land. And why should someone rich dude get to put in a private road into Yosemite?


14 posted on 08/28/2026 4:38:51 PM PDT by conservaKate
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: chickenlips

If you read to the end, you’ll see Clinton operative Lanny Davis is the prime mover, I doubt Trump even knows about it and everything above the last line points strongly toward 5 pinnochios


15 posted on 08/28/2026 4:58:57 PM PDT by sopo
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: chickenlips

“”I’m surprised he hasn’t turned El Capitan into the “Donald J. Trump Bungee Jumping, Zip Line and Water Park”.””

Just wait......


16 posted on 08/28/2026 5:02:29 PM PDT by Thank You Rush
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: drypowder

I agree with that....


17 posted on 08/28/2026 5:03:18 PM PDT by Thank You Rush
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson