Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

To: BenLurkin

He had the choice of when to attempt to commit suicide. If he checked himself in without being under the control of his associates/family at the time, he could easily have committed suicide before check-in. He chose not to. Can we blame the hospital for his decision to wait until after he was admitted?


10 posted on 08/16/2026 7:30:31 AM PDT by ChronicMA
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: ChronicMA

He was trying to get help for his intrusive suicidal thoughts. Hospital admissions help box these people in until they have regained control. They left him to become overwhelmed.


16 posted on 08/16/2026 8:53:15 AM PDT by Chickensoup
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies ]

To: ChronicMA

No, people who want to kill themselves will find a way. Where the hospital is liable is if they did not follow established procedures. Having anyone in there with a belt is a big no-no. Also, any thing that could have been used to anchor the “rope/belt” goes against established procedures in mental health facilities.

The hospital will settle out of court…and get visits by the state inspectors.


32 posted on 08/16/2026 10:30:07 AM PDT by Vermont Lt
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies ]

To: ChronicMA

Absolutely, yes, because there are standard protocols for dealing with suicidal ideation that were not followed.

You do not leave a suicidal patient with possessions that can be used to hang themselves.

That’s no different than a surgeon leaving a sponge in your abdomen that causes sepsis.


42 posted on 08/16/2026 1:00:13 PM PDT by Valpal1 (Yes, I did vote for this!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson