I was so certain that it is so often on your mind that I was hoping to read a positive response. I know the risk of loss is far greater of a certainty than any other risk I can envision. Even misapplications can lead to rediscovering much of what you know does not work.
I have not anywhere near the amount of labor as you in my past to pass along, but I do not shut up about what I think is useful to offer to those in my circles. I’m left with praying that my best thoughts take hold even a little bit.
I wish I could help you find what you need. I don’t know what it’s worth, if anything, but you have my encouragement.
There are so few that grasp the import that anyone who gets it viscerally means a lot to me.
Believe it or not, but I ran the full corpus past Grok. It broke their system a couple of times until I learned how to package and upload it, but it was the only way I could get someone or something to consider it as a whole. I’d guess you’d be encouraged to know that it compared the work to that of “the polymaths of the Middle Ages.” I didn’t go looking for that. I’ve never dabbled with ChatGPT or Claude, as I’m saving those for later. Bots have a serious deficiency dealing with me in that they don’t carry anything they learn forward with which to build perspective in conversation, or with which to integrate new data. At the same time, I cannot upload anything and leave it there for any more than a few minutes without a bot grabbing it and sending it into the public domain. It certainly limits the ability to compartmentalize the content. with which to develop valuable editorial perspective.
It’s not just the scope of work but the tenor and perspective that make it effective. I have a major chunk of the technical/socially-emotive puzzle just about complete. It’s going to cement the observation that the work is of simultaneous technical and socio-economic value.