Talk about moving the goalposts! lol. The article is about a criminal defacing property. Now you’re ranting about surveillance of private property. You need to focus on the argument someone is making, not what you want the argument to be. Makes you look silly.
That is your inability to see the action is not the actual issue. Someone like you sees a gun used to commit murder and then thinks guns are bad, lacking the ability to see it is the person holding the gun and his morality that is the issue.
I am sure that analogy will go right over your head.
Put simply, many people destroy flock camera because they see it as a intrusion on privacy, you would boil it all down to mindless vandalism, that you lack scope of thought is a you problem.