That is your inability to see the action is not the actual issue. Someone like you sees a gun used to commit murder and then thinks guns are bad, lacking the ability to see it is the person holding the gun and his morality that is the issue.
I am sure that analogy will go right over your head.
Put simply, many people destroy flock camera because they see it as a intrusion on privacy, you would boil it all down to mindless vandalism, that you lack scope of thought is a you problem.
In the Army we work with "facts" and "assumptions." What you just made was an assumption. The article states nothing about this particular camera accessing private spaces.
If a surveillance camera is actively pointed or zoomed to look directly inside your home's windows or private living areas, it violates privacy laws. While these cameras are legal on public streets to scan passing traffic, individuals and law enforcement have no legal right to record private spaces where people maintain a reasonable expectation of privacy.
If a flock camera is placed in such a way where it includes a view of your yard, would you feel empowered to vandalize the camera? Or would you seek some remedy other than criminal activity?