Click here: to donate by Credit Card
Or here: to donate by PayPal
Or by mail to: Free Republic, LLC - PO Box 9771 - Fresno, CA 93794
Thank you very much and God bless you.
Posted on 07/29/2026 5:33:03 AM PDT by MtnClimber
Prosecuting a young mother for her angry words seems poisonously symbolic.
ast week, a Minnesota jury convicted Shiloh Hendrix of disorderly conduct for using a racial slur against a Somali man who was harassing and recording her. The “crime” occurred in a public park last year after Hendrix caught a Somali child stealing from her handbag. Hendrix had her hands full with her own toddler at the time, and her protective maternal instincts kicked in.
Black Lives Matter (a domestic terror group that Democrats and Mitt Romney enthusiastically support, even after BLM caused more property damage during the 2020 George Floyd riots than any other event in American history) demanded that Hendrix be charged with a crime. Minnesota prosecutors complied. And anti-American, open borders Democrats got their scalp. Hendrix was found “guilty” for saying a naughty word.
This is the same state that has done nothing while Democrat-aligned domestic terrorists attack Immigration and Customs Enforcement agents. During those encounters, black and Hispanic officers are called horrendously racist names. Similarly, when Islamic supremacists march through Minneapolis calling for Israel’s eradication, they use the most offensive language to intimidate Jewish-Americans. Because corrupt Governor Tim Walz sympathizes with these dangerous leftwing fanatics, their use of the “n-word” is treated as protected free speech. As soon as a young, white mother uses the same word to push back against a stalking Somali migrant, Minnesota’s Democrat cowards decide that language must be punished more vigorously than anti-ICE terrorists who use their vehicles as murder weapons.
Just to put this betrayal of the First Amendment in perspective, this is the same Minnesota criminal “justice” system that permitted state employee Dylan Bryan Adams to vandalize Teslas around the Minneapolis area last year and cause tens of thousands of dollars in damage without suffering any real consequences.
(Excerpt) Read more at americanthinker.com ...
|
|
Click here: to donate by Credit Card Or here: to donate by PayPal Or by mail to: Free Republic, LLC - PO Box 9771 - Fresno, CA 93794 Thank you very much and God bless you. |
If you are being raped by a Somalian, you better be careful not to say a racial slur.
Anti-Christ spirit of Lawlessness rules over that place.
Bkmk
If you are being raped by a Somalian, better be careful not to use a racial slur.
That’s good advice.....we all better write that down and memorize it...... verbatim.
From google AI:
She launched an online fundraising campaign on GiveSendGo with a $1 million goal. The campaign generated massive controversy for “monetizing hate speech,” drawing heavy financial backing from individuals expressing white nationalist, alt-right, and racist sentiments. The fundraiser ultimately netted close to $900,000. In response,
If karmelo anthony can raise 800k for killing someone and George Floyd can get millions for od’ing in police custody..why cant a white woman raise 1m for calling a spade a spade?
Minnesota used to be a bunch of Swedes, working their a$$es off to build great companies like 3M. Swedes are notoriously leftist, but this kind of “justice” should outrage anyone. I just don’t get it unless Minnesota’s elections are as corrupt as California’s.
I hope she uses that money to appeal, it will get overturned easily as the SC has already ruled on this many times. However, I think she is likely the kind of person to just take the money.
I believe she had every right to say what she did regardless of how offensive someone thinks it is. Personally, it is a bit uncouth but that doesn’t matter.
The same goes for “faggot.” If a homo tries to dry-hump you (through clothing) in a bar and you call him a “faggot” in revulsion, you can you be charged, not the assaulting faggot.
I would call anyone an n-word for a million bucks.
For a cigarette??
The same goes for “faggot.” If a homo tries to dry-hump you (through clothing) in a bar and you call him a “faggot” in revulsion, you can you be charged, not the assaulting faggot.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=1rR-wqxRjIg
Typical of Minnesota with Walz and Ellison in office. They were well funded by somalis.
The movie, Citizen Vigilante, might become reality in Minnesota.
“””I just don’t get it unless Minnesota’s elections are as corrupt as California’s.”””””””
They are worse. Just go to the Minnesota Secretary of State website and look at the elections laws. No proof needed to vote.
Same here, with the bonus that organized crime sells bundles of ballots for the candidates with the cash to pay for them and then run the "harvesting" operations. They've got to have one heck of a printing and distribution operation to get all the local candidates correct.
Fixed.
This needs to be appealed. It is clearly a violation of the First Amendment. Federal courts have repeatedly ruled that offensive or vulgar speech cannot be banned. It has to pose a true threat or incite imminent unlawful action.
Calling somebody a nasty name does not qualify.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.