Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

To: Jan_Sobieski

They shouldn’t be in the military.

The risk to the blood supply alone is reason enough not to allow them in: https://www.cdc.gov/hiv/testing/index.html

But they were allowed.

Now those that served honorably deserve to get what they were promised.

Either let them serve out their time to 20 (not recommended - there will be a lot of theatrics - negative impact), or early retirement at 15. They other alternative is to give them a lump sum settlement. In either case, I suspect this will get pushed through the courts anyway (no matter what you do) and they will get something in the end, probably more than what is deserved.

But changing the rules on someone, and then giving them the boot, if they served honorably, is a very dishonorable act.


24 posted on 07/26/2026 8:43:36 AM PDT by Red6
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 20 | View Replies ]


To: Red6

But changing the rules on someone, and then giving them the boot, if they served honorably, is a very dishonorable act.


But it makes for such a great virtue signalling sound bite and engagement trolling mean tweet.


26 posted on 07/26/2026 9:01:21 AM PDT by lodi90
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 24 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson