Posted on 07/24/2026 9:02:12 AM PDT by MinorityRepublican
The WNBA has a historic collective bargaining agreement in hand and is seeing unprecedented growth, but stakeholders in and around the league question whether commissioner Cathy Engelbert is the right person to lead it into the future, according to an ESPN story released Friday.
ESPN's Alexa Philippou interviewed more than 20 owners, management executives, players and other industry insiders, conversations that revealed that for as much business growth Engelbert has overseen, she is not the right person to navigate the demands the league faces and what its stakeholders need.
"I do think Cathy thinks, well, she's done her job. She got us financially set up the right way," a team executive said. "It's the other pieces that we're talking about."
Multiple high-ranking team sources also told ESPN they believe the 2026 season will likely be Engelbert's last.
In an interview last week with ESPN, Engelbert -- who was named WNBA commissioner in May 2019 and has overseen two CBA negotiations -- continued to deflect questions about her future as commissioner.
"I'm focused head-down on executing this highly, highly successful 30th season," Engelbert told Philippou. "I love this league. We're going to continue to drive the business. And don't worry about me. It's more about the team ... that's what we've built here at the W. So I'm really, really optimistic about where we're going in the future."
(Excerpt) Read more at espn.com ...
Dear FRiends,
We need your continuing support to keep FR funded. Your donations are our sole source of funding. No sugar daddies, no advertisers, no paid memberships, no commercial sales, no gimmicks, no tax subsidies. No spam, no pop-ups, no ad trackers.
If you enjoy using FR and agree it's a worthwhile endeavor, please consider making a contribution today:
Click here: to donate by Credit Card
Or here: to donate by PayPal
Or by mail to: Free Republic, LLC - PO Box 9771 - Fresno, CA 93794
Thank you very much and God bless you,
Jim
So are they off the NBA money drip now?
Well, she’s no Humperdinck.
Young freepers may be puzzled by that.
Ingy.
The stake holders don’t want to see the golden goose killed.
Literally.
😝 I was about to ask, if she could sing. 🤪
Until today I had never realized just how weird his name was, I always knew it was odd, but it is really, really, odd.
Arnold George Dorsey could have chosen the stage name George Dorsey for example.
Cathy Engelbert >>>>>>>>>>
She is not easy to lick !
“After the Lovin”
“Stakeholders.”
I’ve heard the women’s NBA has been subsidized from day 1 by the NBA. And after 30 years, this subsidy continues.
In a free market, is there a market for women’s pro basketball?
Does the WNBA have a TV contract or other media rights deals?
How much are tickets to the games?
What attendance do they have?
does the NBA support the WNBA to make a political statement about supporting women’s basketball? Even though such support cuts into the revenues of the NBA teams?
I know the WNBA teams and players have their fans, but, clearly not in sufficient numbers to at least break even financially.
WNBA may always be a niche sport, not a sport with widespread audience.
Englebert presided over 2 CBA’s that got more money for the players (stakeholders) when the league is still dependent on the largess of the NBA. I don’t know how that plays with the ownership groups (shareholders).
The game doesn’t appeal to me. There are a few real stars, the officiating stinks and the players seem more concerned making political statements. That’s not unique to women’s sports, I know. But when you’re attempting to build your league, and make it stand on its own financially, you can’t afford that nonsense.
Caitlin Clark can really play.
Sophia Cunningham is likable.
As a result they are popular.
There isn’t a female player in the WNBA that has a true jumpshot. It’s all kind of a pushed set shot. Caitlyn Clark’s vaunted shot is a set shot that she just kind of flicks. The form is good, but it’s just not what you’d expect. That isn’t a criticism of CC. What works, works. But she is arguably one of the better snipers in the league and even she does not leave the floor by much.
Don’t get me started on Angel Reese and the ‘me-bounds’. I don’t see how she can be such a selfish shooter when she shoots such a low percentage.
With the inconsistent officiating and the goonish play from what passes for ‘bigs’ I think I’m watching Roller Derby instead of basketball. And to think the women’s collegiate game is so much better than this professional league.
Yeah but it's women's basketball that we're talking about.
So we have one question.
Is it entertaining?
If you are talking about CC and SC, then the answer is yes.
The problem with the NBA is that it's a "solved game". All you have to do is to make 3's or go inside for an easy lay up.
No more mid-range baskets that MJ used to make.
So it's a bad product by the NBA right now.
CC is showing something new to sports fans.
And the fans love it.
But the WNBA is being stupid, of course. I don't have to explain that part.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.