Lizzo Is an SI Swimsuit Cover Girl in Bikini & Ralph Lauren Bling

Yahoo News ^ | July 22, 2026 | Evolve Editors

[Bon of Babble]

Lizzo is officially an icon on the cover of Sports Illustrated Swimsuit. Gracing the July 2026 digital cover.

---

TOPICS:
KEYWORDS:

[Bon of Babble]

First we had SI transgender models, then a Muslim in a "hijab and burkini" swimsuit - now Lizzo!

[DFG]

No pictures please!

[Aut Pax Aut Bellum]

The centerfold will unfold to the size of a road map of the United States....

[Bon of Babble]

Sports Illustrated is "woke" - first transgender models:

Then muslim models in hajib and burkini:

And now Lizzo!

[ridesthemiles]

SALES OF THIS ISSUE SHOULD BE NIL

DISGUSTING

[left that other site]

Oh dear...

I just HAD to look.

I wish I didn’t.

[HYPOCRACY]

That fat bag shiite is the “thin” Lizzo. That would be a good name for a band, Thin Lizzo.

[Bon of Babble]

I thought Sports Illustrated had gone out of business years ago after they fully embraced a “woke” agenda.

I remember it coming to our home for years and years..now, not a one of my male relatives subscribes to it, and, in fact have nothing but scorn for this rag.

Maybe this will put them out of business for good.

[PGR88]

Sports Illustrated, Time Magazine, Rolling Stone - all bankrupt failed old names, sold for pennies

But these rags still have name recognition and brand value among boomers and GenX

So can be valuable for propaganda and leftist social-engineering purposes.

[Tell It Right]

It seems appropriate that she’s in a swimsuit, sporting her buoyant look. LOL

[logi_cal869]

Eye bleach:

[Magnum44]

[No name given]

Very!

[No name given]

So do I. Yech!

[PGalt]

LOL! I sea what you did there.

[jroehl]

What the hell is “SI” or “Sports Illustrated”?

Amin moderator, pull this thread with a “No thanks”.

If you are upset about this content. Get over it. You are no longer a kid anymore.

---

GUIDELINES FOR NOTABILITY

---

Before posting a new thread, ask yourself:

[ ] Is it notable?
- Does this affect a large number of people?
- Is it new, unusual, or significant?
- Would someone outside your immediate circle find it interesting?

[ ] Is there evidence?
- Include links or references when possible.
- Distinguish between facts, opinions, and speculation.
- Avoid posting rumors as if they were confirmed.

[ ] Is it the right place?
- Keep posts relevant to the forum’s topic.
- Search first to avoid duplicate threads.
- Use a descriptive thread title.

[ ] Does it add value?
- Explain WHY the topic matters.
- Provide context instead of just dropping a link.
- Encourage discussion by asking thoughtful questions.

[ ] Is it respectful?
- Debate ideas rather than attacking people.
- Avoid insults, slurs, or personal harassment.
- Assume good faith unless there is clear evidence otherwise.

Avoid low-notability posts:
- Personal status updates with no broader relevance.
- Duplicate news already being discussed.
- Clickbait headlines with little substance.
- Unverified social media claims.
- One-line posts that don’t start a discussion.

Rule of Thumb:

If your post would still be interesting or useful to dozens or hundreds
of readers a week from now, it’s probably notable. If it only matters
to one person or for a few minutes, consider adding it to an existing
thread instead of creating a new one.

[No name given]

‘What the hell is “SI” or “Sports Illustrated”?’

Just another magazine ruined by the wokesters.

[rdl6989]

Don’t click the link.

[Vermont Lt]

The photoshop budget on that alone would be bigger than the GDP of Belgium.

[Ken H]

I’ve been waitin’ for this one.