Against the left: A time for resolution - Enough is enough. It's time to speak out.

American Thinker ^ | 22 Jul, 2026 | Eric Utter

[MtnClimber]

I have no illusions (or delusions) about the impact that my writing has (or, more accurately, doesn’t have) on policy makers … or anyone else. But I wish I could tell Republicans one thing: for the love of God, stop playing by Marquess of Queensberry Rules and tell the Democrats to go eff themselves. And then set out to fix the country, preferably by first passing the SAVE America Act … via nuking the filibuster if need be.

Republicans in general are not very good at fighting.

Worse, they are inexplicably bad at explaining the easily explainable and properly stating their case. (Example: the SAVE America Act, still somehow un-passed, though roughly 80% of citizens want it enacted.)

It doesn’t — or shouldn’t -- take a hero to stand against systemic voter fraud, illegal alien crime, the Hillary= and Obama-led attempted coup against the duly elected President Trump via the infamous Russian Collusion Hoax that derailed America for years, or against the absolutely ubiquitous fraud and theft of taxpayers money committed by Somalis, NGOs, Democrat representatives, and a cast of thousands of other criminals.

Nor should it take great courage to state that a man can’t become a woman and vice versa … and shouldn’t be allowed in women’s bath and locker rooms. Or to point out that many of today’s Democrat candidates are bat-sh*t crazy with morals that would make a drunken sailor on shore leave blush … if not vomit. And that a growing number are now to the left of Mao Zedong and at least as evil. (Pro-tip: make sure when running a communist candidate that he or she doesn’t sport a Nazi tattoo. You’re welcome.)

Senate Democrats are now blocking the National Defense Authorization Act which funds the Department of War to spite Trump.

---

TOPICS: Society
KEYWORDS: leftism

[MtnClimber]

The DemocRATs never hear truth in the news programs they watch. They are not part of a leftist cult. It would take deprogramming to reach most of them.

[allendale]

My fervent hope is that some patriotic billionaires will buy up billboard space around the country and post the following:

Any vote for any Democrat, anywhere, anytime is a vote to destroy the American nation.

[Brian Griffin]

The leftists have a point. The SAVE Act would make it more difficult for many. I didn’t have a birth certificate in my possession while in college. It cost me $53 to get a birth certificate with my parents’ names on it for a passport in 2016.

The SAVE Act is unlikely to survive a court challenge presented before a leftist judge. And you know Barrett and Roberts will typically vote to help Democrats in essential matters.

Reform should be based on Trump’s postal service executive order (and an act of Congress clearly backing it).

The ballot of or for any person not verified to be a citizen should be treated as a provisional ballot.

The ballot of any person not having presented a valid matching government picture ID in person or by cellphone should be treated as a provisional ballot.

The mail-in ballot of or for any person without a signature match made by (an FEC-certified) electro-optical means should be treated as a provisional ballot.

The mail-in ballot of or for any person without a matching date of birth of the voter should be treated as a provisional ballot.

The mail-in ballot of or for any person that traveled by an unusual postal path (as might be determined by USPS software after a cellphone Intelligent Mail barcode scan) should be treated as a provisional ballot.

Republican candidates who spend months of time campaigning certainly should be entitled to due process.

[notdownwidems]

its not that Republicans are bad at fighting, explaining, etc;its that many of the elected ones are simply, covertly, leftists in disguise

[bigbob]

AMEN! Stop letting their crap stand unchallenged. Just apply common sense and 95% of their nonsense falls apart.

[ProgressingAmerica]

Did you not have any form of valid identification prior to entering and during college?

I’m not sure the SAVE Act solely hinges on birth certificates, does it? I genuinely do not know however I would find that to be a rather strange benchmark for someone who already has a driver’s license and has had one for a long time.

Otherwise,

I am pretty sure the SAVE Act does not require every citizen to go out and re-prove who they are in order to vote. That would cause riots.

[Taxman]

ping

[Political Junkie Too]

The leftists have a point. The SAVE Act would make it more difficult for many. I didn’t have a birth certificate in my possession while in college. It cost me $53 to get a birth certificate with my parents’ names on it for a passport in 2016.

The SAVE Act is unlikely to survive a court challenge presented before a leftist judge.

I have the opposite opinion. The SAVE act isn't asking anything more than the move to REAL ID did, and that was allowed by the courts.

If you had the documentation for the REAL ID, then you have the documents for the SAVE Act. One cannot be unconstitutional while the other is okay.

-PJ

[drwoof]

The unsettling thing about that is that for some people, it’s exactly what (they think) they want...