Posted on 06/12/2026 9:21:36 AM PDT by RandFan
@DNIGabbard
Today, I’m releasing never before seen intelligence revealing new evidence of past US government funding for more than 120 biolabs in over 30 countries, including Ukraine.
In support of President Trump‘s Executive Order to end federal funding of dangerous gain of function research around the world, and increase transparency and accountability, ODNI will continue working with partners across the Administration to identify where these labs are, what pathogens they contain, and what “research” is being conducted.
(Excerpt) Read more at x.com ...
You can’t explain it to those that won’t open their own eyes and ears to the truth.
"You add nothing to this forum. Nothing."
...Attached herewith are some documents pertaining to the 1979 Sverdlovsk event as portrayed by Soviet sources, and my personal comment on them based on our CISAC visit to Moscow in October.
They now detail that epidemic as intestinal anthrax, attributed to the distribution of contaminated beef. Many cattle were fed a bone meal supplement that had been improperly sterilized and had been produced from naturally infected carcasses.
Anthrax is known to be endemic (or rather enzootic) in the northern Soviet Union and has been a low level but recurrent problem among cattle and other livestock. Sporadic cases of cutaneous and intestinal anthrax have been reported over many years from the Soviet Union. The 1979 outbreak is by far the largest and most vicious epidemic so far recorded.
The scope of the epidemic is attributed to the fact that there was a primary focus of many infected cattle and the illegal distribution of beef from these carcasses without proper veterinary supervision.
My personal conclusion from that evidence, taking account of other evidence from VS sources, is that the present Soviet account of the epidemic is plausible on its face and internally consistent.
Remaining evidence that would link the epidemic to an accident in the facility is quite thin and subject to arguable interpretations and may have other explanations. The current Soviet account is very likely to be true; and at the very least the evidence that they have presented gravely impairs the credibility of a portrayal of the epidemic as directly related to illegal activity in Sverdlovsk.
The contrary testimony of the emigres is for the most part hearsay. While it may be given in good faith it can hardly be said to be grounded on a professional understanding of the different forms of anthrax. Wild rumors do spread around every epidemic: and this one conjoined with the widely held belief that the military contonment No. 19 is a BW development or production facility.
From https://www.rockefeller.edu/our-scientists/joshua-lederberg/2502-nobel-prize/
...We now understand that bacterial mating occurs only through cell-to-cell contact, when a bridge is formed between the two cells that transports genetic information from the donor cell to the recipient...
And his description of transduction led to the development of gene therapy and contributed to the boom in biotechnology and genetic engineering in the 1970s. Dr. Lederberg received half of the 1958 Nobel Prize “for his discoveries concerning genetic recombination and the organization of the genetic material of bacteria. Dr. Tatum and his colleague George Wells Beadle received the second half of the 1958 prize “for their discovery that genes act by regulating definite chemical events.”
But the Obama-installed government of the Ukraine is the only one that used bioweapons to target civilicans.
Not to worry, we be a well rounded actuator...
https://nsf-gov-resources.nsf.gov/2023-08/AI_Research_Institutes_Map_2023_0.pdf
and we gots lots of irons in the fiyo
From https://seek.rockefeller.edu/philanthropy-2-0/
Today, a new generation of donors is rewriting the playbook for biomedical research. For example, several foundations spun off from the tech boom, including the Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation and the Chan Zuckerberg Initiative (CZI), are pumping billions into bioscience labs to support high-risk, high-reward projects, many of which wouldn’t happen without their sponsorship. “We are seeing a new flowering of philanthropy that will allow us to do brand new things in science,” says Rockefeller’s Cori Bargmann, the Torsten N. Wiesel Professor, who for the past five years has split her time between her own neuroscience lab in New York City and CZI in California.
...One thing I’m particularly proud of is that CZI, rather than taking a U.S.-centric perspective, now funds scientists in 61 countries and counting. For example, we just launched a grant program across Africa, Latin America, and former Soviet countries—places where there are many terrific scientists but a dearth of science funding. We’re also supporting Open Science, a movement to make scientific data freely available to access and free to publish, to benefit scientists in under- resourced countries.
Those emerging technocrat tyrants most likely take it for granted they can still insult US and we just roll with it. Sarah Perkins said it best when she wrote:
"the sons and daughters of slav'ry have their oppressions & even their wants—but their enjoyments are proportionate & I am very apt to believe that the Cup of Slavery is embittered with less gall than we are wont to imagine—for tho’ the task master may lift his whip against them, still their minds are unaffected & they appear as destitute of that smart which is keener than the adders sting (the anguish of the field) as their fellow mules. I have seen many of them who appeard to be susceptible of the greatest pleasure you can imagine & who were apparently discovering an enthusiastic enjoyment from their wild disorderly gambols, but never was once witness to any thing like that grief of heart, that affliction of the mind, which is the offspring of sensibility"
Nothing personal intended. They just continuing the destruct Hillary Clinton told US about when she said 'they are going to take some things from US to give to others' and the latest generational richey riches just kicking it up a notch or two. They probably thought we wouldn't even notice.
bfl
A totally debunked conspiracy theory handed to western idiots straight from the Kremlin.
Wrong again; people so often mix up consequences in such a way as to imply certain consequences were always an intent, which usually is an unfounded allegation that stretches consequences into intentions.
2005 Virology Context: In 2005, following the severe acute respiratory syndrome (SARS) outbreaks, the international scientific community (including researchers from the U.S. and China) increased collaboration on virology and epidemiology to understand emerging pathogens. This was intended to help develop vaccines, not as a joint U.S.-Chinese military weapons program.
Contested U.S. Funding: Years later, organizations like the U.S. National Institutes of Health (NIH) provided grants to the U.S.-based nonprofit EcoHealth Alliance, which sub-awarded funding to Chinese labs such as the Wuhan Institute of Virology. Documents have revealed that certain chimeric virus experiments conducted under this grant were later scrutinized or defined by U.S. officials as potential gain-of-function research.
And for which, prior to 2019 Congress made such research as ineligible for U.S. funding, which is why the criminal Fauci subcontracted work to the EcoHealth Alliance.
These were all consequences of certain people’s actions, and not a beginning to end intention of the highest U.S. authorities.
Putting the “U.S.” label on everything every bad actor in government does ignores how “independently” so many rogue bureaucrats had grown to operate.
We don't know this to be true at all. (You have no idea who was involved in this.)
The US government was funding GOF research in a laboratory located in Wuhan, China. (Period. Full stop.)
The conclusion you arrived at (rather hastily, I would point out) may very well be the correct one. But any reflexive rush to protect our preconceived notions we have put together about our country and its government (to be frank, it usually comes down to [cue Elmo voice] "'Murica special!" here) won't hold up in a court of law.
The death toll from Covid appears to be such that the Nazis look like amateurs; this requires a criminal investigation that looks at the high levels of our government.
You are free to think what conspiracy theories you want. I prefer the culprits, like Fauci, be arrested, and after convicted of lying and treason - knowingly going against the stated legal directions of the government in cooperation with foreign enemies, given immunity from any other charges, and forced to testify without benefit of the fifth amendment.
I'm not a conspiracy theorist (despite the incredible success record that conspiracy theorists have amassed over the past 5-6 years). I'm only stating a demonstrable fact; the US government funded GOF research for fifteen years.
Even if we are not mentally capable of being able to consider how this appears to everyone else on the planet, our sense of justice should demand that we suppress our inner sentiments and bring anyone and everyone into a court room to face two simple questions: "What did you know, and when did you know it?"
First, look at key players, starting in 2014:
1. Obama (loves NATO, opposes Putin)
2. Putin (opposes NATO)
3. NATO (opposes Putin, loves Obama, opposes making America great again)
4. Trump (opposes NATO, opposes Obama, trusts Putin)
“1. Obama (loves NATO, opposes Putin) , 2. Putin (opposes NATO), 3. NATO (opposes Putin, loves Obama, opposes making America great again), 4. Trump (opposes NATO, opposes Obama, trusts Putin)”.
You generalize things far beyond the reality of things.
“”What did you know, and when did you know it?””
And all I am suggesting to you is (1) there was no central directive about it, and (2) I expect most people in the U.S. government and that includes most people at the top did not know it.
Let's hope you're right. It may have been simple bureaucratic incompetence or a lack of oversight.
No. It was not Satan who said that.
Yeah, I know it was Doctor Anthony Fauci, but it is the same.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.