Replies

Homosexuals make up roughly 2% of the population, bisexuals make up roughly 3% of the population yet this group combined accounts for 70% of all new HIV infections.

When I say that 5% of the population accounts for 70% of all new infections, yes it’s a gay disease even though that is taboo to say.

https://www.cdc.gov/hiv/media/images/2024/09/cdc-hiv-gay-bisexual-men-2024_dfe-03.png

That said, realize the other 30% of new HIV infections included IV drug users and prostitutes who are also greatly at risk.

Point being, it’s just not a common disease outside of certain circles, DESPITE what Hollywood and our public education has been pumping into people’s heads for a long time.

To give you an idea of how perceptions are managed and spun. Today we have a Ryan White Act: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ryan_White

This boy contracted AIDS from contaminated blood as a hemophiliac.

Truth is, that contaminated blood was likely form guess who?

That boy was picked on and discriminated against because of his AIDS. Which was wrong.

But here is the sick twist to the story, they took a boy likely killed by homo’s, and use him as their poster child (literally) for anti-discrimination laws and programs furthering the homo agenda!

The whole LGBTQIA story is full of contradictions and double standards, twisted perceptions, faux science, and a path of destruction (children left sterile and mutilated) with a lot of politicians grandstanding on this issue when it had maximum momentum.

Now, finally it has faded. There are attempts to resuscitate it, but it’s over. The people have moved on.

Like I posted elsewhere, I do not care what people do in their home, it’s none of my business. They can be having gay orgies wearing fur outfits in a giant Jello tub for all I care. But lay off with demanding everyone else applaud someone for their sexual fetish. Don’t attempt to advertise it subtlety in children’s movies. Don’t force me to attend BS diversity, inclusion and tolerance training, which is really just pushing some gay crap at work. Don’t expect the taxpayer to literally finance someone’s sexual fetish.

I do not expect others to pay for what I like sexually, and I do not want to pay for other people. If some dude wants to be a woman, he can pay to have his Adams apple shaved and body hair laser removed out of his own pocket, don’t expect the federal government or insurance to pay for that. I like big boobs and butts, maybe everyone should pay to have these bolted on my wife (she came up short on the boobs). Why not? What is the logical and consistent argument for why a homo gets a sex change paid for, but a woman can’t get larger breasts paid for? Why can’t I get my penis lengthened and widened? I’d like an extra inch and I feel like I am not in the right body. My self-image isn’t consistent with who I am, that’s also a form of Dysphoria (Dysphoria is a profound state of unease, dissatisfaction, or mental discomfort, diagnostic code F64). Taxpayer, please pay $15,000 to have my pecker made longer and wider to cure my “dysphoria.”

Every person out there, all of us, have our sexual preferences, but only homo’s get insurance and the federal government to pay for theirs.