Can anyone explain how Bass’ share of the vote collapsed way down in these last batch of ballots? That it’s pretty much impossible right?
Statistically speaking yes, it’s impossible.............
Well, define impossible. Democrats excel in the art of the possible.
You see, Nithya NEEDS the votes. But, for Democrats, Bass’ numbers NEED to go way down, too, because if Bass gets more than 50%, then there is no runoff - and little dimmies won’t show up in November - that won’t let them play with numbers for weeks in November if no one votes. CAN’T HAVE THAT!
So, yes, for the good Democrats, Raman’s numbers HAD to explode AND Bass’ numbers had to collapse - both at the same time. And, like magic!
You see, Democrats CLAIM to believe in science, but they beleive in magic more than any Christian.
sorry that happened to you, my limit so far was three, my last reply took 5 seconds or so to post.
“Can anyone explain how Bass’ share of the vote collapsed way down in these last batch of ballots? That it’s pretty much impossible right?”
Anything that changes votes radically away from what the first 50% was is statistically impossible.
It violates the most basic concepts of sampling.
But, to answer your question, the later-counted votes were prepared to give the desired effect.
Any question worth asking, is worth asking five times, eh?
Yes. They cheat.
Yes. They cheat.
Yes. They cheat.
Yes. They cheat.
Yes. They cheat.
Clearly not impossible.
CA’s Deep State has been doing this for decades.
https://x.com/EndWokeness/status/2063827932871590105