Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Bill would bar sex criminals from getting federal pensions in wake of Eric Swalwell scandal
NY Post ^ | 5/01/26 | Ryan King

Posted on 05/02/2026 2:15:59 AM PDT by Libloather

WASHINGTON — A bipartisan pair of female senators are rolling out new legislation to bar convicted sex criminals from getting taxpayer-funded annuities and retirement pay.

Sens. Joni Ernst (R-Iowa) and Kirsten Gillibrand (D-NY) have teamed up on the “No Taxpayer-Funded Pensions for Sex Criminals Act” in the aftermath of rape and sexual misconduct accusations that forced Rep. Eric Swalwell (D-Calif.) to resign last month.

“There should be absolutely no room for the tolerance of egregious sex crimes,” Ernst, herself a sexual assault survivor, said in a statement. “Allowing proven predators to continue collecting their pensions on the taxpayer’s dime only serves to greenlight unacceptable behavior.”

Five women have accused Swalwell of sexual harassment or abuse, with two claiming the married 45-year-old had raped them. The Manhattan District Attorney’s Office and Los Angeles County Sheriff’s Department are investigating those claims, while the Justice Department has confirmed it is probing possible illegal acts by Swalwell in DC

Swalwell has denied criminal wrongoing, but copped to “mistakes in judgment” in statements ending his California gubernatorial campaign April 12 and resigning from the House of Representatives two days later.

Currently, Swalwell is still eligible for a congressional pension once he turns 62, with estimates pegging the giveaway at more than $22,000 annually.

Under current law, legislators who attain five years of service are eligible for the benefit. Swalwell was first elected to Congress in 2012.

On average, lawmakers get an annuity of about $45,276, though longer-serving members earn even more. Annual benefits for current and former lawmakers cost taxpayers about $38 million.

(Excerpt) Read more at nypost.com ...


TOPICS: Business/Economy; Conspiracy; History; Local News
KEYWORDS: california; criminals; pensions; scandal; swalwell
Uh, oh. Release the slush fund names.
1 posted on 05/02/2026 2:15:59 AM PDT by Libloather
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

My prediction is enough predictors (called congresscritters) to vote down …..


2 posted on 05/02/2026 2:24:10 AM PDT by no-to-illegals (The enemy has US surrounded. May God have mercy on them.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Libloather

Better yet, abolish federal pensions altogether. As well as City, County and State. If these assholes aren’t smart enough to know where to invest their money why is it their neighbors’ responsibility to pay for their “retirement”?


3 posted on 05/02/2026 2:31:56 AM PDT by Texas Eagle (If it wasn't for double-standards, Liberals would have no standards at all. )
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Libloather

If they released the names of the people that used that slush fund, there would be quite a few not receiving a pension.


4 posted on 05/02/2026 2:37:18 AM PDT by roving
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: roving

You do know this has tds written all over it. Trump being a convicted rapist and all..


5 posted on 05/02/2026 3:02:16 AM PDT by Ikeon (Life is hard, its harder if you are stupid. )
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: Libloather

Pahleese. Dems start teaching kids to be pedos and sex offenders before kindergarten


6 posted on 05/02/2026 3:17:32 AM PDT by Singermom
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Texas Eagle

Or maybe they were smart enough to get into the system.


7 posted on 05/02/2026 3:23:15 AM PDT by riverrunner
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: Libloather

Dems aren’t mad that Swalwell is a sexual predator. They’re mad he got caught.

CC


8 posted on 05/02/2026 3:37:46 AM PDT by Celtic Conservative (Heghlu'meH QaQ jajvam!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Texas Eagle

Use it to pay for their prison time along with to the victims they accosted. If it runs out, a cot and boloney sandwiches.

wy69


9 posted on 05/02/2026 3:49:46 AM PDT by whitney69
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: Libloather

How about doing that for ALL criminals - there would be almost no Federal pension plan for our “representatives”.


10 posted on 05/02/2026 4:51:21 AM PDT by trebb (So many fools - so little time...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: riverrunner

Smart enough! LOL! F*cking sponges come in all sorts of shapes and sizes and colors. Fund your own retirement, b*tches.


11 posted on 05/02/2026 5:13:36 AM PDT by Texas Eagle (If it wasn't for double-standards, Liberals would have no standards at all. )
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: Libloather

No. Leave pensions out of this sort of thing.

Sex criminal? No problem. Bring criminal charges. If they’re convicted, let ‘em rot in prison. Let victims bring civil suits for damages — and as a practical matter, that’s where a sex criminal’s pension benefits should end up going.

We should mind the boundaries here. Pensions are earned. They are an individual property right. Spouses and heirs have claims on them as well. And yes, public pensions should be reformed; they should be defined contribution and thrift savings based, not defined benefit. That would make them fully funded. Private pensions should be the same in these respects.

We should mind the boundaries.


12 posted on 05/02/2026 5:24:54 AM PDT by sphinx
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Libloather
No elected official should receive a pension. It just encourages them to hang around, like feeding the bears at a park. Holding an elected office should be a break in a person's career, not their entire "working" life.

Worked for the Founding Fathers, so it's good enough for the current batch. Sounds like science.

13 posted on 05/02/2026 5:41:59 AM PDT by Bernard ("Nothing is as expensive as that which the government provides for free." - Ronald Reagan)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Libloather

“Uh, oh. Release the slush fund names.”

Yes. Now!


14 posted on 05/02/2026 7:00:51 AM PDT by dljordan (Yeah, I'm a Boomer and it's all my fault you whiny little bitch.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Libloather

All government pensions are illegitimate. Taking money from taxpayers, under threat of incarceration, at gunpoint if necessary….to give it to people not to work.


15 posted on 05/02/2026 7:06:45 AM PDT by wny
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Libloather

Better make sure they get rich on bribes / speaking fees and insider trading, so they won’t suffer without a pension.


16 posted on 05/02/2026 11:44:53 AM PDT by xxqqzz
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Libloather
I can understand Joni Ernst sponsoring such a bill. But Kirsten Gillibrand? THIS Kirsten Gillibrand?


17 posted on 05/02/2026 4:05:21 PM PDT by Albion Wilde (The first duty of the American government is to protect American citizens, not illegal aliens. --DJT)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson