Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

To: Red Badger

Nuclear “torpedo?”

Didn’t know there was such a thing. What would it be used for, making an enemy aircraft carrier glow in the dark?


8 posted on 04/29/2026 7:00:11 PM PDT by MCSETots
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: MCSETots

Enemy submarines................


9 posted on 04/29/2026 7:03:40 PM PDT by Red Badger (Iryna Zarutska, May 22, 2002 Kyiv, Ukraine – August 22, 2025 Charlotte, North Carolina Say her name)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies ]

To: MCSETots

Target would probably be a harbor facilty...


10 posted on 04/29/2026 7:04:07 PM PDT by SuperLuminal (Where is rabble-rising Sam Adams now that we need him? Is his name Trump, now?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies ]

To: MCSETots

Called a SubRoc torpedo, it would be fired like a torpedo, break the surface and ignite its rocket, fly towards a target submarine, dive back into the water over the target, and then detonate.

Problem was that the boat launching it could not get far enough away to escape the kill radius of the nuclear blast. It was likely a suicide shot.


15 posted on 04/29/2026 7:15:04 PM PDT by rottndog (Did you know there are more airplanes in the ocean than submarines in the sky?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies ]

To: MCSETots

Look up ASROC. We had nukes on a destroyer.


18 posted on 04/29/2026 7:21:50 PM PDT by meatloaf
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies ]

To: MCSETots

“Didn’t know there was such a thing.”

They had them but phased them out. The U.S. withdrew its last nuclear torpedo, the Mark 45 (ASTOR), from service in 1977. Modern U.S. submarines rely on advanced conventional, high-explosive torpedoes like the Mark 48.

The U.S. and Soviet navies developed nuclear torpedoes during the Cold War (1950s–1970s) primarily to destroy high-speed, deep-diving nuclear submarines and aircraft carrier groups that were difficult to hit with conventional weapons. These weapons guaranteed a “kill” against, or massive damage to, hardened targets even with a near-miss. They were literally an underwater “shotgun blast”.

wy69


33 posted on 04/29/2026 10:48:06 PM PDT by whitney69 (uestiuetion and interpret the answer.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies ]

To: MCSETots
...making an enemy aircraft carrier glow in the dark?...

Making an enemy carrier disappear. Carriers need as many as ten conventional torpedoes for sinking.

36 posted on 04/30/2026 4:09:04 AM PDT by GingisK
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies ]

To: MCSETots

Nuclear torpedos like the Mark 45 were anti-harbor weapons. One torpedo would have disabled Haiphong Harbor, for example, back in the day. I served on a boomer (ssbn599) and we carried several and that wasn’t even our mission.


41 posted on 04/30/2026 6:29:48 AM PDT by MNnice
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies ]

To: MCSETots

Other subs, especially SSBNs.


46 posted on 04/30/2026 8:49:15 AM PDT by central_va (I won't be reconstructed and I do not give a damn)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson