Posted on 04/29/2026 4:30:00 PM PDT by MtnClimber
On Monday, Breitbart’s main man, Alex Marlow, said, “All of these people have normalized this climate of violence, and they will not stop until Trump is dead.”
Marlow is on target much of the time. His anti-liberal rants are often delivered in scorching rhetoric, so they stick in listener’s minds. He’s 100 percent correct that many Democrats advocate and defend hateful actions against conservatives. But I must disagree with Marlow on one thing.
When you are in a conflict, and you discover that inciting your followers to violent actions is effective in damaging your enemy, the last thing you do is back off. This is especially true if one of your weaponized woke drones kills the most effective opponent you’ve ever faced.
At most, you would briefly say all the right things, as if you had nothing to do with a bloody assassination. You would fake remorse for what happened. You would claim that your deluded supporter acted entirely alone. You would, as cleverly as you possibly could, point out that Trump was all the bad things you actually support and do.
Most importantly, as subtly as you could, you would assert that Trump brought it on himself because be fought the righteous tyranny of perverted Democrat liberalism.
The covert message would be that Trump got what he deserved. Trump’s supporters are the real violent terrorists, not your million-plus noble Antifa, BLM, woke demonstrators, looters, fire-bombers, and rioters who attack police performing their duties.
The liberal media, almost all of mainstream media, would keep repeating this message over and over to the many Americans who are captive to the dominant leftist internet sites and TV shows. People are deluged with news that portrays liberals as do-gooders saving America from the unintellectual, knuckle-dragging, red-necked terrorists who oppose unlimited immigration and mutilating
(Excerpt) Read more at americanthinker.com ...
The communists did this all of last century and they have not slowed down this century. When political candidates in South America are assassinated, it always seems to be a conservative that is killed.
Dems have absolutely no idea the shitshow that results from a successful assassination. It will go bad very quickly.
Be prepared
Defund the cops.
Stochastic terrorists, a title we must attach to the leftist Dems and their willing accomplices in the leftist media. I do not think either of them would like it but it is true and accurately explained in this article. It only takes two words instead of paragraphs to describe what they are doing to incite weak minded people to take violent action.
I would be highly motivated.
It worked for them by taking out Charlie Kirk.
Well at some point the Right will start killing back and they’ll probably be much better at it.
If they want wholesale killing, they will get a lot more then they bargain for. It won’t end well for THEM.
In any case, the Democrats will find it much harder to control the populace.
And not just Republicans, also the less disciplined of their own supporters.
.Why?
The most important and successful political assassination since 1963 happened in Utah last September, and basically nothing has happened in reaction.
Of course they want him dead, NO DUH..and they will have a celebration when it happens..the left believes in no agenda except VIOLENCE, they believe that in order to get power, they have to kill for it..all I hear from Dems is that Trumps approval numbers are low, well if that is the case, why kill him, just beat him that simple, should be easy right, not much effort, but NO, they dont want to beat him, they want to kill him they have wanted him dead since 2015, they used to adore him, invite him to ALL the cocktail parties, when he was a Dem himself, the second he became a Republican that was it, like “How dare he get off the Dem plantation!”
Thats true, they celebrated Charlie’s murder and pretty much got away with it. I remember when Erika said that they had no idea what they have done, unfortunately NOTHING happened for what they did, they pretty much gained from it. They killed Charlie to get the young people back on the Dem commie side and that has pretty much happened, so killing Charlie was a win/win for them
No. Only the dupes and useful idiots within the party.
Communists and fascists had a lot in common. They both believed in one party rule by one dictator. They both hated capitalism. Communists believed that the State controlled everything. There was no personal ownership. Fascists let you own property, but if you didn’t use the property for what they wanted you to, they could take it away. Fascists and commies preached individual rights, but in truth, the only rights you had, were the ones the totalitarian state allowed you to have. Fascists and communists used violence to bring about change. Lefties today are commies and fascists combined.
Excellent sarcasm!
The Dems are getting their ass handed to them right now.
What a stupid article.
Bad for whom?
The Democrats consistently win with violence. That is why they keep escalating their support and uses of it. We have not seen effective responses to stop this.
In particular, Democrats and their allies are very good at organizing mob violence against specific, individual targets. And they have also had great success with inflammatory rhetoric which inspires crazies to make "Lone Wolf"(tm) attacks. This is the so-called "stochastic terrorism".
And assassinations do not need to be successful to be effective.
Leftists always double-down on their efforts. Warnings and threats of dire consequences will not affect them. Actual counter-violence and removal from positions are the only actions that will make a difference. We must see arrests and long prison terms for violent Leftists in much greater numbers. Or we must see extra-judicial measures.
We are not seeing that yet.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.